Asignment 2: Communicating Science and Health Research Paper

5/11/21, 7(59 PMRubric Detail – Blackboard Learn

Page 1 of 3https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16811594_1&rubric_id=_2237518_1

Rubric Detail
Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.

Does Not Meet
Expectations

Meets
Expectations Very Good Outstanding

Explanation of
how you would
address each
bullet point in
the “Setting the
Stage” and
“Describing the
Science” section
of the NIH Tool:
“A Checklist for
Communicating
Science and
Health Research
to the Public” if
you were
summarizing
your selected
primary
research article
for the general
public

0 (0%) – 23
(28.75%)

Missing,
unoriginal, or
did not
adequately
explain how
you would
address each
bullet point in
the “Setting the
Stage” and
“Describing the
Science”
section of the
NIH Tool: “A
Checklist for
Communicating
Science and
Health
Research to the
Public” if you
were
summarizing
your selected
primary
research article
for the general
public

24 (30%) – 26
(32.5%)

Adequate and
supported
explanation of
how you would
address each
bullet point in
the “Setting the
Stage” and
“Describing the
Science”
section of the
NIH Tool: “A
Checklist for
Communicating
Science and
Health
Research to the
Public” if you
were
summarizing
your selected
primary
research article
for the general
public, but with
infrequent and
minor issues

27 (33.75%) – 28
(35%)

Generally
thorough, well
organized and
supported
explanation of
how you would
address each
bullet point in
the “Setting the
Stage” and
“Describing the
Science”
section of the
NIH Tool: “A
Checklist for
Communicating
Science and
Health
Research to the
Public” if you
were
summarizing
your selected
primary
research article
for the general
public, with
minimal

29 (36.25%) – 30
(37.5%)

Fully developed
and supported,
insightful, and
scholarly
explanation of
how you would
address each
bullet point in
the “Setting the
Stage” and
“Describing the
Science”
section of the
NIH Tool: “A
Checklist for
Communicating
Science and
Health
Research to the
Public” if you
were
summarizing
your selected
primary
research article
for the general
public

Name: PUBH_6128_Module6_Assignment2_Rubric

Description: PUBH 6128D Module 6 Assignment 2 Rubric
Criteria: Adherence to Assignment Expectations (see course for details)

EXIT

Grid View List View

https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16811594_1&rubric_id=_2237518_1#

https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16811594_1&rubric_id=_2237518_1#

5/11/21, 7(59 PMRubric Detail – Blackboard Learn

Page 2 of 3https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16811594_1&rubric_id=_2237518_1

concerns

Includes a one
page summary
of the article
that could be
published in a
newspaper or in
an online article
available for
review by the
general public

0 (0%) – 23
(28.75%)

Missing,
unoriginal, or
did not
adequately
provide a 1
page summary
of the article
that could be
published in a
newspaper or
in an online
article available
for review by
the general
public

24 (30%) – 26
(32.5%)

Adequate and
supported one
page summary
of the article
that could be
published in a
newspaper or
in an online
article available
for review by
the general
public, but with
infrequent and
minor issues

27 (33.75%) – 28
(35%)

Generally
thorough, well
organized and
supported one
page summary
of the article
that could be
published in a
newspaper or
in an online
article available
for review by
the general
public, with
minimal
concerns

29 (36.25%) – 30
(37.5%)

Fully developed
and supported,
insightful, and
scholarly one
page summary
of the article
that could be
published in a
newspaper or
in an online
article available
for review by
the general
public

Written
Communication:
Extent to which
writing, title
page, and
reference list is
professional,
appropriate,
clear, properly
formatted,
grammatically
and structurally
correct,
synthesized,
supported, and
scholarly

0 (0%) – 15
(18.75%)

Writing does
not meet basic
expectations
for a paper (e.g.
clarity, tone,
organization,
grammar,
spelling,
punctuation,
format, source
citation,
references,
synthesis of
source
material,
insufficient
originality, etc.).

16 (20%) – 17
(21.25%)

Adequately
meets writing
expectations
for a paper, but
with infrequent
and minor
issues

18 (22.5%) – 18
(22.5%)

Writing is
generally
sound,
structurally and
grammatically
correct, and
properly
formatted, with
minimal
concerns.
Synthesis is
demonstrated
and ideas are
supported
without
reliance on
quoting.

19 (23.75%) – 20
(25%)

Writing is fully
developed,
exceptionally
well organized,
synthesized,
supported,
scholarly, and
free of writing
errors.
Concepts are
connected
throughout
paper with
appropriate
transitions and
multiple
appropriate
resources and
examples.

Total Points: 80

Name: PUBH_6128_Module6_Assignment2_Rubric

5/11/21, 7(59 PMRubric Detail – Blackboard Learn

Page 3 of 3https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16811594_1&rubric_id=_2237518_1

Description: PUBH 6128D Module 6 Assignment 2 Rubric
Criteria: Adherence to Assignment Expectations (see course for details)

EXIT