Assessment Methods & Decision Processes

Assessment Methods & Decision ProcessesHello Team,
Please remember to submit your assignment to the MGT 6174.e1 course, in Moodle.Selecting the right candidate for staffing efforts can seem sometimes impossible, even when you narrow the selection down to two or three “perfect” matches. Qualified candidates who actually apply to the positions can be a true blessing; however, the decisions on who to select can take some strategy, on the part of the hiring managers (Heneman, Judge, & Kammeyer, 2015).For this assignment, you are required to identify hiring standards for candidate selection as well as effective decision making for hiring these candidates. Chapters 11 and 12, in the textbook, should be used as a guide to aide you towards the completion of this assignment.This paper will be included in your handbook that you are creating for your final.In your paper, along with the introduction and conclusion, you will need to include the following concepts (the inclusion of the sub-titles are a requirement):Hiring Standards
a. What signifies as a qualified candidate?
Methods of Identifying Final Choice (what method will you use for narrowing down the candidates?)
a. Random selection
b. Ranking
c. Grouping
d. Ongoing hiring
Decision Making Efforts
a. Who will participate in the hiring decisions (HR professionals, hiring managers, VP, etc.)?
b. Will diversity be a determining factor?
Job offer process
a. What are the next steps after the decision is made?
b. What strategic approaches will be considered?
c. Who will present the offer to the candidate?
d. Will employee contracts be used?
New Employee Orientation
a. How will the training process look?
This paper should be at least 12-15 pages in length and should meet APA guidelines (double-spacing, title page, etc.). Please note that the title, abstract, table of contents, and reference page do not count towards page count. At least five online university library sources should be used in conjunction with the textbook (a total of six).Assignment: Assessment Methods & Decision ProcessesObjective of Exercise: Selecting the right candidate for staffing efforts can seem sometimes impossible, even when you narrow the selection down to two or three “perfect” matches. Qualified candidates who actually apply to the positions can be a true blessing; however, the decisions on who to select can take some strategy, on the part of the hiring managers (Heneman, Judge, & Kammeyer, 2015).
For this assignment, you are required to identify hiring standards for candidate selection as well as effective decision making for hiring these candidates. Chapters 11 and 12, in the textbook, should be used as a guide to aide you towards the completion of this assignment.
This paper will be included in your handbook that you are creating for your final.
In your paper, you will need to include the following concepts (the inclusion of the sub-titles are a requirement):
A. Hiring Standards
a. What signifies as a qualified candidate?
B. Methods of Identifying Final Choice (what method will you use for narrowing down the candidates?)
a. Random selection
b. Ranking
c. Grouping
d. Ongoing hiring
C. Decision Making Efforts
a. Who will participate in the hiring decisions (HR professionals, hiring managers, VP, etc.)?
b. Will diversity be a determining factor?
D. Job offer process
a. What are the next steps after the decision is made?
b. What strategic approaches will be considered?
c. Who will present the offer to the candidate?
d. Will employee contracts be used?
E. New Employee Orientation
a. How will the training process look?
This paper should be at least 12-15 pages in length and should meet APA guidelines (double-spacing, title page, etc.). Please note that the title, abstract, table of contents, and reference page do not count towards page count. At least five online university library sources should be used in conjunction with the textbook (a total of six).Content and Development
100 Points PossiblePoints PossiblePoints EarnedCommentsAdequate introduction provided1 Hiring standards were thoroughly addressed1 Discussed what method will you use for narrowing down the candidates:
a. Random selection
b. Ranking
c. Grouping
d. Ongoing hiring2 Identified decision making approaches for candidate selection2 Job offer process was distinguised2 New Employee Orientation – how will your training program look2 Adequate conclusion provided1 Used a minimum of 12 pages2 Readability and Style
2 Points PossiblePoints PossiblePoints EarnedCommentsSentences are complete, clear and concise.1 Paragraphs transitioned effectively from one to the next1 Mechanics
5 Points PossiblePoints PossiblePoints EarnedCommentsRules of grammar, usage and punctuation are followed.1 The inclusion of your textbook + five outside references were used2 Citations included & APA style followed as needed.1 Spelling is correct.1 Total Points200Submitted on Time?Date Due and Date Submitted:7/31/17 Adjusted Points0Comments:Grading Rubrics Critical ElementsDistinguished(100%)Proficient(85%)Basic(70%)Below Expectations(50%)Non-Performance(0%)Thesis StatementRaises the strongest   objection to the thesis presented in the assignment. The objection is strongly grounded in research and logical reasoning.Raises a plausible objection to the thesis presented in the assignment. The objection is mostly grounded in research and logical reasoning. Raises an objection to the thesis presented in the assignment. The objection is somewhat grounded in research and logical reasoning.Attempts to raise an objection to the thesis presented in the assignment. The objection is minimally grounded in research and logical reasoning. The objection to the thesis is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.Counter ArgumentProvides a astrong, thorough rebuttal to the objection. The rebuttal effectively demonstrates that the thesis can withstand the objection and applies the principles of charity and accuracy. Provides a rebuttal to the objection. The rebuttal mostly demonstrates that the thesis can withstand the objection and mostly applies the principles of charity and accuracy. Provides a  limited rebuttal to the objection. The rebuttal somewhat demonstrates that the thesis can withstand the objection and somewhat applies the principles of charity and accuracy. Attempts to provide a rebuttal to the objection; however, the rebuttal minimally demonstrates that the thesis can withstand the objection and does not apply the principles of charity and accuracy. The rebuttal is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.Conclusion– Provides clear and concise closing remarks that comprehensively summarize the essay. The remarks consider the broader controversy and/or further research that could offer additional insight into the moral solution of the business problem. Provides closing remarks that summarize the essay. The remarks mostly consider the broader controversy and/or further research that could offer additional insight into the moral solution of the business problem. The closing remarks are somewhat unclear. Provides closing remarks that minimally summarizes the essay. The remarks minimally consider the broader controversy and/or further research that could offer additional insight into the moral solution of the business problems. The closing remarks are unclear and/or vague. Attempts to provide closing remarks that summarize the essay, however, the remarks do not consider the broader controversy and/or further research that could offer additional insight into the moral solution of the business problem. The closing remarks are unclear and vague.The closing remarks are either nonexistent or lack the components described in the assignment instructions. Written Communication: Context of and Purpose for Writing Demonstrates methodical application of organization and presentation of content. The purpose of the writing is evident and easy to understand. Summaries, quotes, and/or paraphrases fit naturally into the sentences and paragraphs. Paper flows smoothly. Demonstrates sufficient application of organization and presentation of content. The purpose of the writing is, for the most part, clear and easy to understand. There are some problems with the blending of summaries, paraphrases, and quotes. Paper flows somewhat smoothly.Demonstrates a limited understanding of organization and presentation of content in written work. The purpose of the writing is somewhat evident but may not be integrated throughout the assignment. There are many problems with the blending of summaries, paraphrases, and quotes. Paper does not flow smoothly in all sections. Organization and presentation of content are extremely limited. The purpose of the writing is unclear. There is little or no blending of summaries, paraphrases, and quotes. Paper does not flow smoothly when read. . Written Communication: Control of Syntax and Mechanics – Displays meticulous comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains no errors and is very easy to understand. Displays comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains only a few minor errors and is mostly easy to understandDisplays basic comprehension of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains a few errors which may slightly distract the reader. Fails to display basic comprehension of syntax or mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains major errors which distract the reader. . Written Communication: Required Formatting Accurately uses required formatting consistently throughout the paper, title page, and reference page. Exhibits required formatting throughout the paper. However, layout contains a few minor errors.Exhibits limited knowledge of required formatting throughout the paper. However, layout does not meet all requirements. Fails to exhibit basic knowledge of required formatting. There are frequent errors, making the layout difficult to distinguish as required style. . Written Communication: Word Requirement The length of the paper is equivalent to the required number of words.The length of the paper is nearly equivalent to the required number of words. The length of the paper is equivalent to at least three quarters of the required number of words.The length of the paper is equivalent to at least one half of the required number of words. . Written Communication: Resource RequirementUses more than the required number of scholarly sources, providing compelling evidence to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment. Uses the required number of scholarly sources to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment. Uses less than the required number of sources to support ideas. Some sources may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are used within the body of the assignment. Citations may not be formatted correctly.Uses an inadequate number of sources that provide little or no support for ideas. Sources used may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are not used within the body of the assignment. Citations are not formatted correctly. .