Case Study – Design Process

Unacceptable Needs Improvement Competent Exemplary

Suggest the prototyping technique you would use for
this system and support your rationale.

0 (0.00%)
Did not submit or incompletely suggested the prototyping
technique you would use for this system; did not submit or
incompletely supported your rationale.

10.125 (11.25%)
Partially suggested the prototyping technique you would use
for this system; partially supported your rationale.

11.475 (12.75%)
Satisfactorily suggested the prototyping technique you would
use for this system; satisfactorily supported your rationale.

13.5 (15.00%)
Thoroughly suggested the prototyping technique you would
use for this system; thoroughly supported your rationale.

Create a management plan containing eight to ten stages
for proper design of such a system.

0 (0.00%)
Did not submit or incompletely created a management plan
containing eight to ten stages for proper design of such a
system.

10.125 (11.25%)
Partially created a management plan containing eight to ten
stages for proper design of such a system.

11.475 (12.75%)
Satisfactorily created a management plan containing eight to
ten stages for proper design of such a system.

13.5 (15.00%)
Thoroughly created a management plan containing eight to
ten stages for proper design of such a system.

Explain each stage of the management plan and justify
your rationale.

0 (0.00%)
Did not submit or incompletely explained each stage of the
management plan and did not submit or incompletely justified
your rationale.

10.125 (11.25%)
Partially explained each stage of the management plan and
partially justified your rationale.

11.475 (12.75%)
Satisfactorily explained each stage of the management plan
and satisfactorily justified your rationale.

13.5 (15.00%)
Thoroughly explained each stage of the management plan
and thoroughly justified your rationale.

Estimate the length of time it will take to complete each
stage of the management plan.

0 (0.00%)
Did not submit or incompletely estimated the length of time it
will take to complete each stage of the management plan.

10.125 (11.25%)
Partially estimated the length of time it will take to complete
each stage of the management plan.

11.475 (12.75%)
Satisfactorily estimated the length of time it will take to
complete each stage of the management plan.

13.5 (15.00%)
Thoroughly estimated the length of time it will take to
complete each stage of the management plan.

Compare and contrast the self-check-in interface with the
interface a receptionist would use.

0 (0.00%)
Did not submit or incompletely compared and contrasted the
self-check-in interface with the interface a receptionist would
use.

10.125 (11.25%)
Partially compared and contrasted the self-check-in interface
with the interface a receptionist would use.

11.475 (12.75%)
Satisfactorily compared and contrasted the self-check-in
interface with the interface a receptionist would use.

13.5 (15.00%)
Thoroughly compared and contrasted the self-check-in
interface with the interface a receptionist would use.

Use Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative, Dia, to
create a total of two graphical representations of your
proposed interfaces, one for the self-check-in and one
for the receptionist.

0 (0.00%)
Did not submit or incompletely used Microsoft Visio or an
open source alternative, Dia, to create a total of two graphical
representations of your proposed interfaces, one for the self-
check-in and one for the receptionist.

6.75 (7.50%)
Partially used Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative,
Dia, to create a total of two graphical representations of your
proposed interfaces, one for the self-check-in and one for the
receptionist.

7.65 (8.50%)
Satisfactorily used Microsoft Visio or an open source
alternative, Dia, to create a total of two graphical
representations of your proposed interfaces, one for the self-
check-in and one for the receptionist.

9 (10.00%)
Thoroughly used Microsoft Visio or an open source
alternative, Dia, to create a total of two graphical
representations of your proposed interfaces, one for the self-
check-in and one for the receptionist.

Three references. 0 (0.00%)
No references provided.

3.375 (3.75%)
Does not meet the required number of references; some or
all references poor quality choices.

3.825 (4.25%)
Meets number of required references; all references high
quality choices.

4.5 (5.00%)
Exceeds number of required references; all references high
quality choices.

Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements. 0 (0.00%)
More than 6 errors present.

6.75 (7.50%)
5-6 errors present.

7.65 (8.50%)
3-4 errors present.

9 (10.00%)
0-2 errors present.

Name: w04a1

Description: w04a1 – Case Study – Design Process
ExitExit

Grid View List View

Name:w04a1

Description:w04a1 – Case Study – Design Process
ExitExit