Discussion: Review of Current Healthcare Issues

5/31/2021 Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn

https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16846915_1&rubric_id=_2413736_1 1/5

Rubric Detail
Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.

  Excellent Good Fair Poor

Name: NURS_6053_Module01_Week01_Discussion_Rubric EXIT

Grid View List View

5/31/2021 Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn

https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16846915_1&rubric_id=_2413736_1 2/5

  Excellent Good Fair Poor

Main Posting 45 (45%) – 50
(50%)

Answers all
parts of the
discussion
question(s)
expectations
with re�ective
critical analysis
and synthesis
of knowledge
gained from
the course
readings for the
module and
current credible
sources.
 
Supported by
at least three
current,
credible
sources.
 
Written clearly
and concisely
with no
grammatical or
spelling errors
and fully
adheres to
current APA
manual writing
rules and style.

40 (40%) – 44
(44%)

Responds to
the discussion
question(s) and
is re�ective
with critical
analysis and
synthesis of
knowledge
gained from
the course
readings for the
module.
 
At least 75% of
post has
exceptional
depth and
breadth.
 
Supported by
at least three
credible
sources.
 
Written clearly
and concisely
with one or no
grammatical or
spelling errors
and fully
adheres to
current APA
manual writing
rules and style.

35 (35%) – 39
(39%)

Responds to
some of the
discussion
question(s).
 
One or two
criteria are not
addressed or
are super�cially
addressed.
 
Is somewhat
lacking
re�ection and
critical analysis
and synthesis.
 
Somewhat
represents
knowledge
gained from the
course readings
for the module.
 
Post is cited
with two
credible
sources.
 
Written
somewhat
concisely; may
contain more
than two
spelling or
grammatical
errors.
 
Contains some
APA formatting
errors.

0 (0%) – 34 (34%)
Does not
respond to the
discussion
question(s)
adequately.
 
Lacks depth or
super�cially
addresses
criteria.
 
Lacks re�ection
and critical
analysis and
synthesis.
 
Does not
represent
knowledge
gained from the
course readings
for the module.
 
Contains only
one or no
credible
sources.
 
Not written
clearly or
concisely.
 
Contains more
than two
spelling or
grammatical
errors.
 
Does not
adhere to
current APA
manual writing
rules and style.

Main Post:
Timeliness

10 (10%) – 10
(10%)

Posts main post
by day 3.

0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not post
by day 3.

5/31/2021 Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn

https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16846915_1&rubric_id=_2413736_1 3/5

  Excellent Good Fair Poor

First
Response

17 (17%) – 18
(18%)

Response
exhibits
synthesis,
critical thinking,
and application
to practice
settings.
 
Responds fully
to questions
posed by
faculty.
 
Provides clear,
concise
opinions and
ideas that are
supported by at
least two
scholarly
sources.
 
Demonstrates
synthesis and
understanding
of learning
objectives.
 
Communication
is professional
and respectful
to colleagues.
 
Responses to
faculty
questions are
fully answered,
if posed.
 
Response is
e�ectively
written in
standard,
edited English.

15 (15%) – 16
(16%)

Response
exhibits critical
thinking and
application to
practice
settings.
 
Communication
is professional
and respectful
to colleagues.
 
Responses to
faculty
questions are
answered, if
posed.
 
Provides clear,
concise
opinions and
ideas that are
supported by
two or more
credible
sources.
 
Response is
e�ectively
written in
standard,
edited English.

13 (13%) – 14
(14%)

Response is on
topic and may
have some
depth.
 
Responses
posted in the
discussion may
lack e�ective
professional
communication.
 
Responses to
faculty
questions are
somewhat
answered, if
posed.
 
Response may
lack clear,
concise
opinions and
ideas, and a few
or no credible
sources are
cited.

0 (0%) – 12 (12%)
Response may
not be on topic
and lacks
depth.
 
Responses
posted in the
discussion lack
e�ective
professional
communication.
 
Responses to
faculty
questions are
missing.
 
No credible
sources are
cited.

5/31/2021 Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn

https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16846915_1&rubric_id=_2413736_1 4/5

  Excellent Good Fair Poor

Second
Response

16 (16%) – 17
(17%)

Response
exhibits
synthesis,
critical thinking,
and application
to practice
settings.
 
Responds fully
to questions
posed by
faculty.
 
Provides clear,
concise
opinions and
ideas that are
supported by at
least two
scholarly
sources.
 
Demonstrates
synthesis and
understanding
of learning
objectives.
 
Communication
is professional
and respectful
to colleagues.
 
Responses to
faculty
questions are
fully answered,
if posed.
 
Response is
e�ectively
written in
standard,
edited English.

14 (14%) – 15
(15%)

Response
exhibits critical
thinking and
application to
practice
settings.
 
Communication
is professional
and respectful
to colleagues.
 
Responses to
faculty
questions are
answered, if
posed.
 
Provides clear,
concise
opinions and
ideas that are
supported by
two or more
credible
sources.
 
Response is
e�ectively
written in
standard,
edited English.

12 (12%) – 13
(13%)

Response is on
topic and may
have some
depth.
 
Responses
posted in the
discussion may
lack e�ective
professional
communication.
 
Responses to
faculty
questions are
somewhat
answered, if
posed.
 
Response may
lack clear,
concise
opinions and
ideas, and a few
or no credible
sources are
cited.

0 (0%) – 11 (11%)
Response may
not be on topic
and lacks
depth.
 
Responses
posted in the
discussion lack
e�ective
professional
communication.
 
Responses to
faculty
questions are
missing.
 
No credible
sources are
cited.

5/31/2021 Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn

https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16846915_1&rubric_id=_2413736_1 5/5

  Excellent Good Fair Poor

Participation 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Meets
requirements
for
participation by
posting on
three di�erent
days.

0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not meet
requirements
for participation
by posting on 3
di�erent days.

Total Points: 100

Name: NURS_6053_Module01_Week01_Discussion_Rubric

EXIT