IHP 604 Review infection rate data

IHP 604 Review infection rate dataIn this assignment, you will review infection rate data related to central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs), catheter-associated urinary tract
infections (CAUTIs), and surgical site infections (SSIs) after colon surgery. Using the information provided in the Raw Data Example document, prepare a
PowerPoint presentation to discuss with the organization’s operational excellence committee.
Think about how the data throughout your readings and course activities to date could have been assembled. Be prepared to cover the following:
 How was data was collected, and who collected it?
 What fields in the EHR were used to gather the information?
 What is the impact of meaningful use on data collection, EHR design, and quality outcomes?
 What are the implications of not collecting the data?
 What does the data tell you about the quality of patient care from 2015 to 2016? Is the overall infection rate higher or lower in 2016 when compared
with 2015?
 What is leadership’s role in disseminating the information and identifying ways to sustain or reduce the infection rates?
For assistance with developing your presentation, read Chapters 4, 5, 6, 18 and 19 in your textbook and review the Meaningful Use Definition and Objectives
webpage and the Raw Data Example document. For assistance with creating PowerPoint presentations, log in to Infobase, select the search tab, type in
“PowerPoint,” and click the search button. View the specific video that addresses your needs.
RubricGuidelines for Submission: Your presentation should be submitted as a 10- to 15-slide Microsoft PowerPoint presentation with sources cited in APA format.
Critical Elements Proficient (100%) Needs Improvement (75%) Not Evident (0%) Value
Data Collection Well defines and clearly articulates
information on how data was collected and
who collected itProvides information on how data was
collected and who collected but does not
clearly articulateDoes not provide information on how data
was collected and who collected it15EHR Fields Correctly identifies EHR fields used to gatherinformationIncorrectly identifies or does not identify EHR
fields used to gather information15Meaningful Use
ImpactWell defines and clearly articulates impact of
meaningful use on data collection, design,
and quality outcomesProvides impact of meaningful use on data
collection, design, and quality outcomes but
does not clearly articulateDoes not provide impact meaningful use on
data collection, design, and quality outcomes
15Lack of Data
CollectionWell defines and clearly articulates
implications of not collecting dataProvides implications of not collecting data
but does not clearly articulateDoes not provide implications of not
collecting data15Quality of Patient
CareWell defines and clearly articulates
comparison data of patient care and overall
infection rate from 2015 to 2016Provides comparison data of patient care and
overall infection rate from 2015 to 2016 but
does not clearly articulateDoes not provide comparison data of patient
care and overall infection rate from 2015 to
201615Leadership Role Well defines and clearly articulates
leadership’s role in disseminating informationProvides leadership’s role in disseminating
information but does not clearly articulateDoes not provide leadership’s role in
disseminating information15Presentation Flow
and Articulation of
ResponsePresentation has a logical flow and
submission has no major errors related to
citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or
organizationPresentation does not have a logical flow
and/or has major errors related to citations,
grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization
that negatively impact readability and
articulation of main ideasSubmission has critical errors related to
citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or
organization that prevent understanding of
ideas10Total 100%