EDUC 554
Literacy Assessment Toolbox Grading Rubric
Criteria
Levels of Achievement
Content 70%
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
Not present
Literacy Assessment 1: Informal Reading Inventory
10 points
All the following are evident.
· The informal reading inventory is appropriately created.
· Its supported with research as a literacy practice.
· The assessment is original.
· It connects to the practicum course for EDUC 554.
· An overview of the assessment is provided in the template and is relevant for the grade level in focus.
8 to 9 points
All but one of the following components are evident.
· The informal reading inventory is appropriately created.
· Its supported with research as a literacy practice.
· The assessment is original.
· It connects to the practicum course for EDUC 554.
· An overview of the assessment is provided in the template and is relevant for the grade level in focus.
1 to 7 points
Two or more of the following are missing.
· The informal reading inventory is appropriately created.
· Its supported with research as a literacy practice.
· The assessment is original.
· It connects to the practicum course for EDUC 554.
· An overview of the assessment is provided in the template and is relevant for the grade level in focus.
0 points
Not present
Literacy Assessment 2: Diagnostic Reading Tool
10 points
All the following are evident.
· The diagnostic reading tool is appropriately created.
· Its supported with research as a literacy practice.
· The assessment is original.
· It connects to the practicum course for EDUC 554.
· An overview of the assessment is provided in the template and is relevant for the grade level in focus.
8 to 9 points
All but one of the following are evident.
· The diagnostic reading tool is appropriately created.
· Its supported with research as a literacy practice.
· The assessment is original.
· It connects to the practicum course for EDUC 554.
· An overview of the assessment is provided in the template and is relevant for the grade level in focus.
1 to 7 points
Two or more of the following are missing.
· The diagnostic reading tool is appropriately created.
· Its supported with research as a literacy practice.
· The assessment is original.
· It connects to the practicum course for EDUC 554.
· An overview of the assessment is provided in the template and is relevant for the grade level in focus.
0 points
Not present
Literacy Assessment 3: Progress Monitoring Tool
10 points
All the following are evident.
· The progress monitoring tool is appropriately created.
· Its supported with research as a literacy practice.
· The assessment is original.
· It connects to the practicum course for EDUC 554.
· An overview of the assessment is provided in the template and is relevant for the grade level in focus.
8 to 9 points
All but one of the following are evident.
· The progress monitoring tool is appropriately created.
· Its supported with research as a literacy practice.
· The assessment is original.
· It connects to the practicum course for EDUC 554.
· An overview of the assessment is provided in the template and is relevant for the grade level in focus.
1 to 7 points
Two or more of the following are missing.
· The progress monitoring tool is appropriately created.
· Its supported with research as a literacy practice.
· The assessment is original.
· It connects to the practicum course for EDUC 554.
· An overview of the assessment is provided in the template and is relevant for the grade level in focus.
0 points
Not present
Research-based Support
37 to 40 points
Each created assessment tool is clearly supported with two research-based journal articles from literacy journals for a total of 6 references. The articles are within the past five years. The research from the articles provides a rationale for the use of each assessment tool.
34 to 36 points
Each created assessment tool is supported with two research-based journal articles and are mostly from literacy journals for a total of 6 references. Most of the articles are within the past five years. The research from the articles provides a rationale for the use of most of the assessment tools.
1 to 33 points
There are not two research-based journal articles from literacy journals for each of the assessment tools. Many of the articles that are used for support are from articles that are over five years old. There is not a clear connection between the research and the rationale for the use of the assessment tool.
0 points
Not present
Structure 30%
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
Not present
Mechanics
14 to 15 points
The sentence structure is complete with correct spelling, punctuation, capitalization, varied word choices. The writing exemplifies a professional.
13 points
The sentence structure has minor errors (fragments, run-ons, subject-verb not parallel) with correct spelling, punctuation, and capitalization. There is some variation in word choices.
1 to 12 points
The sentence structure has several errors in sentence fluency with multiple fragments/run-ons and poor spelling, and punctuation. There is limited variation in word choice.
0 points
Not present
Literacy Assessment (s) Template
10 points
The template is fully completed for 3 assessments and submitted as one-word document. It is answered with clarity and in well-developed sentences.
8 to 9 points
The template is mostly completed and attached. Most of the sentences have clarity and are well developed.
1 to 7 points
The template is attached but has many incomplete sections. Some of the sentences lack clarity and are incomplete. OR not submitted as one-word document.
0 points
Not present
Current APA Format
5 points
There is current APA formatting including a title page, header, and reference page. The research that supports each assessment is referenced correctly on the reference page.
4 points
There are some current APA formatting errors, and one of the following is missing: a title page, header, and reference page. Most of the research that supports each assessment is referenced correctly on the reference page.
1 to 3 points
There are many current APA formatting errors, and two of the following are missing: a title page, header, and reference page. The research that supports each assessment is not referenced correctly on the reference page.
0 points
Not present
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more