Meeting the Needs of Diverse Students in English Language Arts

Rubic_Print_Format

Course Code Class Code Assignment Title Total Points

SEC-516 SEC-516-O500 Meeting the Needs of Diverse Students in English Language Arts 50.0

Criteria Percentage No Submission (0.00%) Insufficient (69.00%) Approaching (74.00%) Acceptable (87.00%) Target (100.00%) Comments Points Earned

Criteria 100.0%

Summary of Building Relevancy 20.0% Not addressed. Summary of building relevancy is weakly developed or incomplete and/or does not address all questions. Summary of building relevancy is unfocused or vague or does not address all questions. Summary of building relevancy is logical and clearly addresses all questions. Summary of building relevancy is insightful and thoroughly addresses all questions.

Analysis Summary of Assessment Data 20.0% Not addressed. Analysis summary of assessment data is insufficient and/or does not address all questions. Analysis summary of assessment data is minimal or does not clearly address all questions. Analysis summary of assessment data is descriptive and clearly address all questions. Analysis summary of assessment data is realistic and comprehensively addresses all questions.

Summary of Opportunities for Students to Make Connections 20.0% Not addressed. Opportunities for student to make connections summary is unrealistic and/or does not address all questions. Opportunities for student to make connections summary is weak or marginally addresses all questions. Opportunities for student to make connections summary is effective and descriptively addresses all questions. Opportunities for student to make connections summary is thought provoking and expertly addresses all questions.

Summary Reflection for Future Professional Practice 20.0% Not addressed. Professional reflection is unconvincing and/or does not address all components of the question. Professional reflection is artificial or does not address all components of the question. Professional reflection is considerable and meaningfully addresses all components of the question. Professional reflection is compelling and proficiently addresses all components of the question.

Organization 10.0% Not addressed. An attempt is made to organize the content, but the sequence is indiscernible. The ideas presented are compartmentalized; may not relate to each other. The content may not be adequately organized even though it provides the audience with a sense of the main idea. The content is logically organized. The ideas presented relate to each other. The content provides the audience with a clear sense of the main idea. The content is well organized and logical. There is a sequential progression of ideas related to each other. The content is presented as a cohesive unit. Provides the audience with a clear sense of the main idea.

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 10.0% Not addressed. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction are used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistent language or word choice is present. Sentence structure is lacking. Submission includes some mechanical errors, but they do not hinder comprehension. Varieties of effective sentence structures are used, as well as some practice and content-related language. Submission is virtually free of mechanical errors. Word choice reflects well-developed use of practice and content-related language. Sentence structures are varied and engaging.

Total Weightage 100%