pad 501 week 8 assignment

· Grid View

· List View

Unacceptable

Needs Improvement

Competent

Exemplary

Questions the organization’s evaluation activities will seek to answer.

Points:

0 (0.00%)
The document does not identify any of the ways the organization’s evaluation activities will measure the success of the program.

Points:

16.5 (15.00%)
The document attempts to identify some of the ways the organization’s evaluation activities will measure the success of the program, but the connection is vague.

Points:

18.7 (17.00%)
The document identifies at least some of the ways organization’s evaluation activities will measure the success of the program.

Points:

22 (20.00%)
The document clearly identifies the ways the organization’s evaluation activities will measure the success of the program.

Evaluation plans and time frames.

Points:

0 (0.00%)
The document does not contain a plan for evaluating the success of the program.

Points:

16.5 (15.00%)
The document contains an unclear plan for evaluating the success of the program or fails to provide any time frames or ranges for the identified evaluations.

Points:

18.7 (17.00%)
The document includes both plans for evaluating the success of the program and some time frames or ranges of time for the identified evaluations.

Points:

22 (20.00%)
The document includes not only clear plans for evaluating the success of the program, but also specific time frames for the identified evaluations.

If studying a sample of participants, how the sample will be selected? Procedures that will be used to determine whether the program was implemented as planned, who conducts the evaluation and who receives the results.

Points:

0 (0.00%)
The document does not explain whether or not a group will be studied or provide information on how those studies will occur.

Points:

16.5 (15.00%)
The document does not explain whether or not a group will be studied but provides information for how those studies will occur and mentions in some way either who will receive the results or how the results might be used.

Points:

18.7 (17.00%)
The document explains whether or not a group will be studied and provides information for how those studies will occur, who will conduct the evaluations, and at least some of the people that will receive the results of the evaluations.

Points:

22 (20.00%)
Document explains whether or not a group will be studied and provides clear information along with procedures for how those studies will occur, who will conduct the evaluations, and names all parties that will receive the results of the evaluations.

How the program or project defines success.

Points:

0 (0.00%)
Document fails to provide an explanation for the how the program will define success.

Points:

16.5 (15.00%)
Document provides a vague explanation for the how the program will define success.

Points:

18.7 (17.00%)
Document provides a clear but overly detailed explanation for the how the program will define success.

Points:

22 (20.00%)
Document provides a high-level but clear explanation for the how the program will define success.

Adheres to guidelines.

Points:

0 (0.00%)
The document is fewer than two pages in length or does not respond to more than three of the seven questions.

Points:

8.25 (7.50%)
The document is fewer than two pages or more than three pages in length. Does not respond to each of the seven questions, or does not respond in a way that is accessible to someone outside the project.

Points:

9.35 (8.50%)
The document is 2–3 pages in length and attempts to respond to each of the seven questions, though it is sometimes overly detailed for an outside audience.

Points:

11 (10.00%)
Document is 2–3 pages in length and attempts to respond to each of the seven questions at a high level and in a way that can be understood by both those within and those outside the project.

Writing mechanics.

Points:

0 (0.00%)
The document contains more than 10 grammatical errors.

Points:

8.25 (7.50%)
The document contains 7–10 grammatical errors.

Points:

9.35 (8.50%)
The document contains 4–6 grammatical errors.

Points:

11 (10.00%)
The document contains three or fewer grammatical errors.

Name:w08a1

Description:w08a1 – Review the Grant Management Cycle