6/7/21, 12:19 PMModule 1 Assignment: Research and Report – BIO216C01 Pathophysiology (Susan Kennedy) SU21 – CCCOnline
Page 1 of 3https://ccco.desire2learn.com/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=2318746&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=3115660
Research and Report Assignment Rubric
Course: BIO216C01 Pathophysiology (Susan Kennedy) SU21
Criteria Highly Proficient (81-100%)
Moderately Proficient (61-
80%)
Somewhat Proficient (41-
60%)
Not Proficient (1-40%) No Submission (0 points)
Content Development
Evidence: Selec!ng and
using informa!on to
inves!gate a point of
view or conclusion
Connec!ons to
Discipline: Makes
connec!ons across
disciplines and
perspec!ves
Conclusions and Related
Outcomes (Implica!ons
and Consequences)
Control of Syntax and
Mechanics
15 points
Uses appropriate, relevant,
and compelling content to
illustrate mastery of the
subject, conveying the
writer’s understanding and
shaping the whole work.
Paper meets the minimum
length of 750 words.
12 points
Uses appropriate, relevant,
and compelling content to
explore ideas within the
context of the discipline and
shape the whole work. Paper
meets the minimum length
of 750 words.
9 points
Uses appropriate and
relevant content to develop
and explore ideas
throughout most of the
work. Paper may not meet
the minimum length of 750
words.
6 points
Uses appropriate and
relevant content to develop
simple ideas in some parts of
the work. Paper may not
meet the minimum length of
750 words.
0 points
Work is not submi”ed, or
submi”ed work contains
none of the required
components, or submi”ed
work contains plagiarized
content.
15 points
Informa!on is taken from
source(s) with enough
interpreta!on and evalua!on
to develop a comprehensive
analysis or synthesis.
Viewpoints of experts are
ques!oned thoroughly.
12 points
Informa!on is taken from
source(s) with enough
interpreta!on and evalua!on
to develop a coherent
analysis or synthesis.
Viewpoints of experts are
subject to ques!oning.
9 points
Informa!on is taken from
source(s) with some
interpreta!on and
evalua!on, but not enough
to develop a coherent
analysis or synthesis.
Viewpoints of experts are
taken as mostly fact, with
li”le ques!oning.
6 points
Informa!on is taken from
source(s) without any
interpreta!on or evalua!on.
Viewpoints of experts are
taken as fact, without
ques!on.
0 points
Work is not submi”ed, or
submi”ed work contains
none of the required
components, or submi”ed
work contains plagiarized
content.
10 points
Student independently
creates a whole out of
mul!ple parts (synthesizes),
or student draws conclusions
by combining examples,
facts, or theories from more
than one field of study or
perspec!ve, using
discussions, readings, and
explora!on in final
submission.
8 points
Student independently
connects examples, facts, or
theories from more than one
field of study or perspec!ve,
using discussions, readings,
and explora!on in final
submission.
6 points
When prompted, student
connects examples, facts, or
theories from more than one
field of study or perspec!ve,
using discussions, readings,
and explora!on in final
submission.
4 points
When prompted, student
presents examples, facts, or
theories from more than one
field of study or perspec!ve,
using discussions, readings,
and explora!on in final
submission.
0 points
Work is not submi”ed, or
submi”ed work contains
none of the required
components, or submi”ed
work contains plagiarized
content.
10 points
In the final research and
report paper, conclusions
and related outcomes
(consequences and
implica!ons) are logical, and
reflect student’s informed
evalua!on and ability to
place evidence and
perspec!ves discussed in
priority order.
8 points
Conclusions are logically !ed
to a range of informa!on,
including opposing
viewpoints. Related
outcomes (consequences and
implica!ons) are iden!fied
clearly in the student’s final
research and report paper.
6 points
Conclusion is logically !ed to
informa!on because
informa!on is chosen to fit
the desired conclusion. Some
related outcomes
(consequences and
implica!ons) are iden!fied
clearly in the student’s final
research and report paper.
4 points
Conclusion is inconsistently
!ed to some of the
informa!on discussed.
Related
outcomes (consequences and
implica!ons) are
oversimplified in the
student’s final research and
report paper.
0 points
Work is not submi”ed, or
submi”ed work contains
none of the required
components, or submi”ed
work contains plagiarized
content.
5 points
Uses language that skillfully
communicates meaning to
readers with clarity and
fluency, and is virtually error
free.
4 points
Uses straigh#orward
language that conveys
meaning to readers. The
language in the por#olio has
few errors.
3 points
Uses language that generally
conveys meaning to readers
with clarity, although wri!ng
may include some errors.
2 points
Uses language that
some!mes impedes
understanding of meaning
because of errors in usage.
0 points
Work is not submi”ed, or
submi”ed work contains
none of the required
components, or submi”ed
work contains plagiarized
content.
6/7/21, 12:19 PMModule 1 Assignment: Research and Report – BIO216C01 Pathophysiology (Susan Kennedy) SU21 – CCCOnline
Page 2 of 3https://ccco.desire2learn.com/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=2318746&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=3115660
Total
Overall Score
Sources and Evidence 5 points
Demonstrates skillful use of
high-quality, credible, and
relevant sources to develop
ideas that are appropriate for
the discipline and genre of
the wri!ng. Sources are cited
and referenced using APA
Style.
4 points
Demonstrates consistent use
of credible and relevant
sources to support ideas that
are situated within the
discipline and genre of the
wri!ng. Sources are all or
mostly cited and referenced
using APA Style.
3 points
Demonstrates an a”empt to
use credible and/or relevant
sources to support ideas that
are appropriate for the
discipline and genre of the
wri!ng. Sources are mostly
cited and referenced using
APA Style.
2 points
Demonstrates an a”empt to
use sources to support ideas,
but sources may or may not
be cited and referenced
using APA Style.
0 points
Work is not submi”ed, or
submi”ed work contains
none of the required
components, or submi”ed
work contains plagiarized
content.
Highly Proficient (81-100%)
49 points minimum
Moderately Proficient (61-80%)
37 points minimum
Somewhat Proficient (41-60%)
25 points minimum
Not Proficient (1-40%)
1 point minimum
6/7/21, 12:19 PMModule 1 Assignment: Research and Report – BIO216C01 Pathophysiology (Susan Kennedy) SU21 – CCCOnline
Page 3 of 3https://ccco.desire2learn.com/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=2318746&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=3115660
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more