PSY570 Eight-Step Model DiscussionAfter reading Chapter 17 in the text, discuss the eight-step ethical decision-making model proposed by the authors. List the steps with a brief summary of each step.
Comment on the value or lack of value you perceive in this model. Explain your understanding of supported and unsupported models used in making important decisions in ethics and life. (For example, The eight-step model is a supported model because it incorporates the APA Code of Ethics design. The restorative justice model may be considered an alternative ethical decision-making model for bringing peace to opposing parties in a conflict. Forms of dogmatic or authoritarian parenting approaches may be considered an unsupported form of resolving conflicts in a family.)
Would a supported or unsupported model best describe your current approach to ethical decision-making? Explain your reasoning.To complete this assignment, review the Discussion Rubric PDF document.Textbook: Ethics in Psychology and the Mental Health Professions: Standards and Cases, Chapter 17
This chapter discusses the eight-step ethical decision-making model proposed by the authors.PSY 570 Discussion Guidelines and Rubric Overview: You will write an initial post (2–3-paragraph response) to the discussion and reply to at least two posts during the week outside of your initial post thread. These discussions offer you the opportunity to express your own thoughts, ask questions for clarification, and gain insight from your classmates’ responses and instructor’s guidance. A response needs to be respectful and substantive, indicating a response with depth beyond “I agree” or “I disagree.” Your participation posts must also demonstrate greater critical thinking beyond reframing another post.Recommended best practices:Initial post (1): Composed of two to three paragraphs unless otherwise noted In Module One, complete the initial post by Thursday at 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time. In Modules Two through Ten, complete the initial post by Thursday at 11:59 p.m. of your local time zone. Considers material (course content, other discussions, etc.) from the current module and previous modulesResponse posts (2): Reply to at least two other classmates outside of your own initial post thread In Module One, complete the two response posts by Sunday at 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time. In Modules Two through Ten, complete the two response posts by Sunday at 11:59 p.m. of your local time zone. Must have more depth and critical thinking than simply “I agree” or “you are wrong”For more information, see the Course Etiquette section of the COCE Guide to Student Success.Critical Elements Exemplary (100%) Proficient (90%) Needs Improvement (70%) Not Evident (0%) ValueApplication The discussion post was written in a manner indicating that the student clearly understood the ethical concepts presented in class; demonstrates appropriate application of concepts (100%)The discussion post was written in a manner indicating that the student understood the ethical concepts presented in class; demonstrates application of concepts (90%)The discussion post was written in a manner indicating that the student struggled with the ethical concepts presented in class (70%)Student did not provide an initial response to the discussion question (0%)35Timeliness Submits initial post on time (100%)Submits initial post one day late (70%)Submits initial post two or more days late (0%)10Critical Thinking Student demonstrates critical thinking with the initial and response posts. Critical elements are addressed in a comprehensive manner, tying the response back to the literature presented in the week (100%)Student provides a well- thought-out initial post that demonstrates a working knowledge of the literature presented from the week; response posts demonstrate critical analysis (90%)Student provides a well- thought-out initial post, but does not make connections to the material presented in the course work from the week; response posts indicate challenges with critical thinking (70%)Student did not provide an initial response to the discussion question (0%)25Writing (Mechanics/Citations)No errors related to organization, grammar and style, or citations (100%)Minor errors related to organization, grammar and style, and citations (90%)Some errors related to organization, grammar and style, and citations (70%)Major errors related to organization, grammar and style, and citations (0%)20Participation Student provides the required quantity of participation posts which are substantive, respectful, and add something new to the discussion (100%)Student provides the required quantity of participation posts. A majority of the posts are substantive and respectful to fellow learners (90%)Student does not submit the required quantity or quality of participation posts (70%)Student does not submit any participation posts to fellow learners for the discussion question (0%)10Earned Total 100%
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.Read more
Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.Read more
Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.Read more
Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.Read more
By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.Read more