QSO 435 Milestone Three Guidelines and Rubric
In Milestone Three, you will submit a position paper targeted for the vice president of Operations at your scenario organization. You will present the PMO
position and recommendation for this project that builds upon your previous information paper and decision paper.
Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:
• Introduce nontraditional project management (PM) frameworks.
• Describe the characteristics in the organization that support an adaptive project management (APM) approach.
• Analyze three nontraditional project management (TPM) frameworks and identify capabilities and limitations of each.
• Select a project management approach as the most appropriate for the project, with a defense of your selection.
Guidelines for Submission: Your Milestone Three submission, Analysis and Project Framework position paper, must be 1–2 pages in length (plus a cover page
and references) and must be written in APA format. Use double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins. Include at least three references
cited in APA format.
Critical Elements Exemplary (100%) Proficient (85%) Needs Improvement (55%) Not Evident (0%) Value
Nontraditional PM
Frameworks
Meets “Proficient” criteria,
reviews various types of project
management approaches, and
builds upon the information
and decision papers from
Modules One and Two;
submission is well organized
and detailed to a level that
shows keen insight into the
nuances, risks, and benefits
Reviews various types of project
management approaches and
builds upon the information
and decision papers from
Modules One and Two;
describes each approach based
on specific references to the
previous analysis
Reviews various types of project
management approaches and
builds upon some of the
information and decision
papers from Modules One and
Two, but does not make specific
references to previous analysis
or lacks necessary detail
Does not review types of
project management
approaches, or does not build
upon the information and
decision papers from Modules
One and Two
22.5
Characteristics in
Organization That
Support an APM
Approach
Meets “Proficient” criteria and
provides clear linkages between
the organization and the unique
requirements of the project
Thoroughly describes the
characteristics in the
organization that support an
adaptive project management
(APM) approach
Describes the characteristics in
the organization that support
an adaptive project
management (APM) approach
with some gaps in description
and/or missing key details
Does not describe the
characteristics in the
organization that support an
adaptive project management
(APM) approach
22.5
Non-TPM
Approaches
Meets “Proficient” criteria, and
analysis identifies the key
capabilities and limitations,
linking back to the scenario
project without superfluous
information
Accurately analyzes three
nontraditional project
management frameworks to
identify the capabilities and
limitations of each
Analyzes three nontraditional
project management
frameworks, but does not
identify the capabilities and
limitations of each
Does not analyze three
nontraditional project
management frameworks
22.5
Select Project
Management
Approach
Meets “Proficient” criteria, and
reasoning shows thorough
analysis of various aspects in
context with the chosen project
Selects project management
approach with thorough
defense of why it is most
appropriate; includes
explanation of why a traditional
approach should not be used
Selects project management
approach, but does not provide
a thorough defense of why it is
most appropriate and/or does
not include an explanation of
why a traditional approach
should not be used
Does not select a project
management approach
22.5
Articulation of
Response
Submission is free of errors
related to citations, grammar,
spelling, syntax, and
organization and is presented in
a professional and easy-to-read
format
Submission has no major errors
related to citations, grammar,
spelling, syntax, or organization
Submission has major errors
related to citations, grammar,
spelling, syntax, or organization
that negatively impact
readability and articulation of
main ideas
Submission has critical errors
related to citations, grammar,
spelling, syntax, or organization
that prevent understanding of
ideas
10
Earned Total 100%
QSO 435 Milestone Three Guidelines and Rubric
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more