Criteria Ratings Points
Discussion 80 to >71.0 pts
Advanced
Criteria include the
following: 1. Great
discussion of whether
the experience levels
of the employees
played a part in the
company’s declining
metrics. 2. Great
discussion of how
Leadership styles may
have played a part in
the company’s
declining metrics.
3. Great discussion of
how management
styles may have
played a part in the
company’s declining
metrics. 4. Great
discussion of how
types of power may
have played a part in
the company’s
declining metrics.
5. A Pareto analysis
was developed that
lists the three most
important problems
causing the decrease
in profit. 6. The
narrative flows very
well and remains
focused throughout
the paper. 7. At
least 4 of the required
peer-reviewed source
citations are from
peer-reviewed
journals published
within the past 4 years
and 1 text citation. 8.
Biblical concepts are
fully integrated into
the discussion.
71 to >55.0 pts
Proficient
Criteria include the
following: 1. Good
discussion of whether
the experience levels
of the employees
played a part in the
company’s declining
metrics. 2. Good
discussion of how
Leadership styles may
have played a part in
the company’s
declining metrics.
3. Good discussion of
how management
styles may have
played a part in the
company’s declining
metrics. 4. Good
discussion of how
types of power may
have played a part in
the company’s
declining metrics.
5. A Pareto analysis
was developed that
lists the two most
important problems
causing the decrease
in profit. 6. The
narrative flows
somewhat well and
remains focused
throughout the paper.
7. At least 3 of the
required
peer-reviewed
sources are from
peer-reviewed
journals published
within the past 4 years
and 1 text citation.
8. Biblical concepts
are partially integrated
into the discussion.
55 to >0.0 pts
Developing
Criteria include the
following: 1. Some
discussion of whether
the experience levels
of the employees
played a part in the
company’s declining
metrics. 2. Some
discussion of how
Leadership styles
may have played a
part in the company’s
declining metrics.
3. Some discussion
of how management
styles may have
played a part in the
company’s declining
metrics. 4. Some
discussion of how
types of power may
have played a part in
the company’s
declining metrics.
5. A Pareto analysis
was developed that
lists the one most
important problem
causing the decrease
in profit. 6. The
narrative doesn’t flow
well and is unfocused
throughout the paper.
7. At least 2 of the
required
peer-reviewed
sources are from
peer-reviewed
journals published
within the past 4
years and 1 text
citation. 8. Bible
verses are mentioned
into the discussion.
0 pts
Not Present
Criteria include
the following:
1. No
discussion of
whether the
experience
levels of the
employees
played a part in
the company’s
declining
metrics. 2. No
discussion of
how Leadership
styles may
have played a
part in the
company’s
declining
metrics. 3. No
discussion of
how
management
styles may
have played a
part in the
company’s
declining
metrics. 4. No
discussion of
how types of
power may
have played a
part in the
company’s
declining
metrics. 5. A
Pareto analysis
was not
developed.
6. There is no
narrative.
7. No sources
are from
peer-reviewed
journals.
8. Biblical
concepts are
not integrated
into the
80 pts
Case Study Grading Rubric | MGMT501_B02_202130
Criteria Ratings Points
discussion.
APA Format 10 to >8.0 pts
Advanced
Proper APA format is
used.
8 to >6.0 pts
Proficient
Between 1-3 APA
formatting errors are
present.
6 to >0.0 pts
Developing
Between 4-6 APA
formatting errors are
present.
0 pts
Not Present
More than 6
APA formatting
errors are
present.
10 pts
Grammar/Spelling 10 to >8.0 pts
Advanced
Proper spelling and
grammar are used.
8 to >6.0 pts
Proficient
Between 1-3 spelling
and grammar errors
are present.
6 to >0.0 pts
Developing
Between 4-6 spelling
and grammar errors
are present.
0 pts
Not Present
More than 6
spelling, and
grammar errors
are present.
10 pts
Headings 5 to >4.0 pts
Advanced
All of the required
headings are included
4 to >3.0 pts
Proficient
Most of the required
headings are
included.
3 to >0.0 pts
Developing
Some of the required
headings are
included
0 pts
Not Present
The required
headings are
not included
5 pts
Word Count 10 to >8.0 pts
Advanced
At least 1,000-1,500
words are submitted.
8 to >6.0 pts
Proficient
900-999 or 1501-1600
words are submitted.
6 to >0.0 pts
Developing
800-899 or
1601-1700 words are
submitted.
0 pts
Not Present
Less than 800
or more than
1700 words are
submitted.
10 pts
Total Points: 115
Case Study Grading Rubric | MGMT501_B02_202130
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more