Rubric_Print_FormatB421.xlsx

Rubic_Print_Format

Course Code Class Code Assignment Title Total Points

Benchmark – Effective Decision Making

Criteria Percentage Unsatisfactory (0.00%) Less Than Satisfactory (74.00%) Satisfactory (79.00%) Good (87.00%) Excellent (100.00%) Comments Points Earned

Content 70.0%

Describe a scenario that requires collaborative action in the decision-making process. 15.0% Description of scenario is irrelevant, it fails to require collaborative action in the decision-making process. Description of scenario is somewhat relevant, it is underdeveloped and inadequately requires collaborative action in the decision-making process. Description of scenario is relevant, it adequately requires collaborative action in the decision-making process. Description of scenario is relevant, it proficiently requires collaborative action in the decision-making process. Description of scenario is relevant, it insightfully requires collaborative action in the decision-making process.

Provide specific details as to whether collaboration is merited in the decision-making process. 20.0% Does not provide specific details as to whether collaboration is merited in the decision-making process. Major points are irrelevant to the assignment. Details are incomplete or omits as to whether collaboration is merited in the decision-making process. Major points are not clear or persuasive. Content is not comprehensive or persuasive. Provides specific details as to whether collaboration is merited in the decision-making process. Research is inadequate in either relevance, quality of outside sources, or currentness. Content is comprehensive and accurate; definitions are clearly stated. Provides specific details as to whether collaboration is merited in the decision-making process. Research is adequate, current, relevant, and addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment’s criteria. Content is comprehensive, accurate, and persuasive; definitions are clearly stated. Provides specific details as to whether collaboration is merited in the decision-making process. Research is adequate, current, relevant, and addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment’s criteria.

Discuss whether collaboration is the best way to achieve a positive outcome, including why or why not. 15.0% Discussion of whether collaboration is the best way to achieve a positive outcome, including why or why not is missing. Discussion of whether collaboration is the best way to achieve a positive outcome, including why or why not is vague and inconsistent. Discussion of whether collaboration is the best way to achieve a positive outcome, including why or why not is present and clear. Discussion of whether collaboration is the best way to achieve a positive outcome, including why or why not is present, clear, and makes some connections to research. Discussion of whether collaboration is the best way to achieve a positive outcome, including why or why not is clear, concise and makes connections to current research.

Describe the strategic approach as well as communication techniques a team leader would use to ensure a quality decision is made. (Comp 5.5) 20.0% Description of the strategic approach as well as communication techniques a team leader would use to ensure a quality decision is made is missing. Description of the strategic approach as well as communication techniques a team leader would use to ensure a quality decision is made is vague and inconsistent. Description of the strategic approach as well as communication techniques a team leader would use to ensure a quality decision is made is present and clear. Description of the strategic approach as well as communication techniques a team leader would use to ensure a quality decision is made is present, clear, and makes some connections to research. Description of the strategic approach as well as communication techniques a team leader would use to ensure a quality decision is made is clear, concise and makes connections to current research.

Organization and Effectiveness 20.0%

Thesis Development and Purpose 7.0% Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

Argument Logic and Construction 8.0% Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 5.0% Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

Format 10.0%

Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) 5.0% Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. All format elements are correct.

Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 5.0% Sources are not documented. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

Total Weightage 100%