RubricDetailNURS6512.html

Rubric Detail

Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.

Content

Name: NURS_6512_Week_3_Assignment_1_Rubric_Option_2

Grid View

List View

 
Excellent

Good

Fair

Poor

In 3–4 pages, address the following:

An explanation of the health issues and risks that are relevant to the child you were assigned.

Points:

Points Range:
20 (20%) – 25 (25%)

The response clearly, accurately, and in detail explains the relevant health issues and risks for the assigned child.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range:
19 (19%) – 24 (24%)

The response accurately explains the relevant health issues and risks for the assigned child.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range:
18 (18%) – 23 (23%)

The response vaguely and with some inaccuracy explains the relevant health issues and risks for the assigned child.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range:
0 (0%) – 17 (17%)

The response is inaccurate and/or missing explanations of the relevant health issues and risks for the assigned child.

Feedback:

Describe additional information you would need in order to further assess his or her weight-related health.

Points:

Points Range:
20 (20%) – 25 (25%)

The response clearly and accurately describes detailed additional information needed to further assess the child’s weight-related health.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range:
19 (19%) – 24 (24%)

The response accurately describes additional information needed to further assess the child’s weight-related health.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range:
18 (18%) – 23 (23%)

The response vaguely and with some inaccuracy describes additional information needed to further assess the child’s weight-related health.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range:
0 (0%) – 17 (17%)

The response is inaccurate and/or missing a description of additional information needed to further assess the child’s weight-related health.

Feedback:

Identify and describe any risks, and consider what further information you would need to gain a full understanding of the child’s health. Think about how you could gather this information in a sensitive fashion.

Points:

Points Range:
18 (18%) – 20 (20%)

The response clearly and accurately identifies and describes in detail any risks to the child’s health.

The response clearly and accurately identifies and describes in detail further information needed to gain a full understanding of the child’s health, with a detailed explanation of how to gather that information in a way that is sensitive to the child.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range:
16 (16%) – 17 (17%)

The response accurately identifies and describes any risks to the child’s health.

The response accurately identifies and describes further information needed to gain a full understanding of the child’s health, with a clear explanation of how to gather that information in a way that is sensitive to the child.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range:
14 (14%) – 14 (14%)

The response vaguely and with some inaccuracy identifies and describes any risks to the child’s health.

The response vaguely identifies and describes further information needed to gain a full understanding of the child’s health, with a vague explanation of how to gather that information in a way that is sensitive to the child.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range:
0 (0%) – 13 (13%)

The response identifies inaccurately and/or is missing descriptions of any risks to the child’s health.

The response identifies inaccurately and/or is missing descriptions of further information needed to gain a full understanding of the child’s health, with an inadequate or missing explanation of how to gather that information in a way that is sensitive to the child.

Feedback:

Taking into account the parents’ and caregivers’ potential sensitivities, list at least three specific questions you would ask about the child to gather more information.

Points:

Points Range:
10 (10%) – 10 (10%)

The response clearly and accurately lists three or more specific questions that would gather more information about the child.

Specific questions are carefully worded to clearly demonstrate sensitivity to the parent(s) or caregiver(s) of the child.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range:
9 (9%) – 9 (9%)

The response lists three specific questions that would gather more information about the child.

Specific questions are worded to demonstrate sensitivity to the parent(s) or caregiver(s) of the child.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range:
8 (8%) – 8 (8%)

The response lists three questions with wording that is vague and lacking specificity for gathering more information about the child.

Some wording of the questions lacks sensitivity to the parent(s) or caregiver(s) of the child.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range:
0 (0%) – 7 (7%)

The response lists two or fewer confusing or inadequate questions, or is missing questions, for gathering more information about the child.

Wording of questions provided lacks sensitivity to the parent(s) or caregiver(s) of the child.

Feedback:

Provide at least two strategies you could employ to encourage the parents or caregivers to be proactive about their child’s health and weight.

Points:

Points Range:
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

The response clearly describes two or more detailed strategies to encourage the parent(s) or caregiver(s) to be proactive about the child’s health and weight.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range:
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

The response describes at least two strategies to encourage the parent(s) or caregiver(s) to be proactive about the child’s health and weight.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range:
3 (3%) – 3 (3%)

The response vaguely describes two strategies to encourage the parent(s) or caregiver(s) to be proactive about the child’s health and weight.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range:
0 (0%) – 2 (2%)

The response inadequately describes one strategy or is missing strategies to encourage the parent(s) or caregiver(s) to be proactive about the child’s health and weight.

Feedback:

Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:
Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all required criteria.

Points:

Points Range:
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.

A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range:
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.

Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet are brief and not descriptive.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range:
3 (3%) – 3 (3%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time.

Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range:
0 (0%) – 2 (2%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided. Feedback: Written Expression and Formatting - English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation Points: Points Range: 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 3 (3%) - 3 (3%) Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 2 (2%) Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. Feedback: Written Expression and Formatting - The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running heads, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.

Points:

Points Range:
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Uses correct APA format with no errors.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range:
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range:
3 (3%) – 3 (3%)

Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range:
0 (0%) – 2 (2%)

Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.

Feedback:

Show Descriptions

Show Feedback

In 3–4 pages, address the following:

An explanation of the health issues and risks that are relevant to the child you were assigned.–

Levels of Achievement:

Excellent
20 (20%) – 25 (25%)

The response clearly, accurately, and in detail explains the relevant health issues and risks for the assigned child.

Good
19 (19%) – 24 (24%)

The response accurately explains the relevant health issues and risks for the assigned child.

Fair
18 (18%) – 23 (23%)

The response vaguely and with some inaccuracy explains the relevant health issues and risks for the assigned child.

Poor
0 (0%) – 17 (17%)

The response is inaccurate and/or missing explanations of the relevant health issues and risks for the assigned child.

Feedback:

Describe additional information you would need in order to further assess his or her weight-related health.–

Levels of Achievement:

Excellent
20 (20%) – 25 (25%)

The response clearly and accurately describes detailed additional information needed to further assess the child’s weight-related health.

Good
19 (19%) – 24 (24%)

The response accurately describes additional information needed to further assess the child’s weight-related health.

Fair
18 (18%) – 23 (23%)

The response vaguely and with some inaccuracy describes additional information needed to further assess the child’s weight-related health.

Poor
0 (0%) – 17 (17%)

The response is inaccurate and/or missing a description of additional information needed to further assess the child’s weight-related health.

Feedback:

Identify and describe any risks, and consider what further information you would need to gain a full understanding of the child’s health. Think about how you could gather this information in a sensitive fashion.–

Levels of Achievement:

Excellent
18 (18%) – 20 (20%)

The response clearly and accurately identifies and describes in detail any risks to the child’s health.

The response clearly and accurately identifies and describes in detail further information needed to gain a full understanding of the child’s health, with a detailed explanation of how to gather that information in a way that is sensitive to the child.

Good
16 (16%) – 17 (17%)

The response accurately identifies and describes any risks to the child’s health.

The response accurately identifies and describes further information needed to gain a full understanding of the child’s health, with a clear explanation of how to gather that information in a way that is sensitive to the child.

Fair
14 (14%) – 14 (14%)

The response vaguely and with some inaccuracy identifies and describes any risks to the child’s health.

The response vaguely identifies and describes further information needed to gain a full understanding of the child’s health, with a vague explanation of how to gather that information in a way that is sensitive to the child.

Poor
0 (0%) – 13 (13%)

The response identifies inaccurately and/or is missing descriptions of any risks to the child’s health.

The response identifies inaccurately and/or is missing descriptions of further information needed to gain a full understanding of the child’s health, with an inadequate or missing explanation of how to gather that information in a way that is sensitive to the child.

Feedback:

Taking into account the parents’ and caregivers’ potential sensitivities, list at least three specific questions you would ask about the child to gather more information.–

Levels of Achievement:

Excellent
10 (10%) – 10 (10%)

The response clearly and accurately lists three or more specific questions that would gather more information about the child.

Specific questions are carefully worded to clearly demonstrate sensitivity to the parent(s) or caregiver(s) of the child.

Good
9 (9%) – 9 (9%)

The response lists three specific questions that would gather more information about the child.

Specific questions are worded to demonstrate sensitivity to the parent(s) or caregiver(s) of the child.

Fair
8 (8%) – 8 (8%)

The response lists three questions with wording that is vague and lacking specificity for gathering more information about the child.

Some wording of the questions lacks sensitivity to the parent(s) or caregiver(s) of the child.

Poor
0 (0%) – 7 (7%)

The response lists two or fewer confusing or inadequate questions, or is missing questions, for gathering more information about the child.

Wording of questions provided lacks sensitivity to the parent(s) or caregiver(s) of the child.

Feedback:

Provide at least two strategies you could employ to encourage the parents or caregivers to be proactive about their child’s health and weight.–

Levels of Achievement:

Excellent
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

The response clearly describes two or more detailed strategies to encourage the parent(s) or caregiver(s) to be proactive about the child’s health and weight.

Good
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

The response describes at least two strategies to encourage the parent(s) or caregiver(s) to be proactive about the child’s health and weight.

Fair
3 (3%) – 3 (3%)

The response vaguely describes two strategies to encourage the parent(s) or caregiver(s) to be proactive about the child’s health and weight.

Poor
0 (0%) – 2 (2%)

The response inadequately describes one strategy or is missing strategies to encourage the parent(s) or caregiver(s) to be proactive about the child’s health and weight.

Feedback:

Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:
Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all required criteria.–

Levels of Achievement:

Excellent
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.

A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria.

Good
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.

Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet are brief and not descriptive.

Fair
3 (3%) – 3 (3%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time.

Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic.

Poor
0 (0%) – 2 (2%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided. Feedback: Written Expression and Formatting - English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation-- Levels of Achievement: Excellent 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. Good 4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Fair 3 (3%) - 3 (3%) Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Poor 0 (0%) - 2 (2%) Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. Feedback: Written Expression and Formatting - The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running heads, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.-- Levels of Achievement: Excellent 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Uses correct APA format with no errors. Good 4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors. Fair 3 (3%) - 3 (3%) Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors. Poor 0 (0%) - 2 (2%) Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. Feedback: Total Points: 100 Name: NURS_6512_Week_3_Assignment_1_Rubric_Option_2

Place your order
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more
error: Content is protected !!
Open chat
1
You can contact our live agent via WhatsApp! Via + 1 929 473-0077

Feel free to ask questions, clarifications, or discounts available when placing an order.

Order your essay today and save 30% with the discount code GURUH