Read the “Evaluating the Quality of Open Source Software” article (Spinellis, et al., 2009). What are the strengths and weaknesses of this particular study? (For example, does the study do an adequate job of collecting and analyzing representative samples?) What would you suggest that the authors do to remedy those weaknesses and why? Use both your text and the article An Introduction to Research Design (Ganster, 2003). You may also draw on any book, article, website, or other reliable resource in answering this question.
Ganster, D. (2003). An introduction to research design. Data Analysis and Interpretation course notes.
Spinellis, D., Gousios, G., Karakoidas, V., Louridas, P., Adams, P. J., Samoladas, I., & Stamelos, I. (2009). Evaluating the quality of open source software. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science, 233, 5–2 8.
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.Read more
Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.Read more
Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.Read more
Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.Read more
By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.Read more