Assignment 3

8/25/2020

https://blackboard.strayer.edu/webapps/rubric/do/course/manageRubrics?dispatch=view&context=course&rubricId=_859038_1&course_id=_273455_1 1/3

Assignment 3 Rubric

Assignment 3: Diversity and Ethics

Levels of Achievement

Criteria UnacceptableBelow 60% F
Needs
Improvement
65% D

Fair 75% C Proficient85% B
Exemplary
100% A

SOC101-A3-1
1.
Thoughtfully
reflects on
past
experiences
as they relate
to
consideration
of diverse and
ethical
perspectives.

0.00 %
Does not
reflect on past
experiences.

65.00 %
Minimally
reflects on
past
experiences
(background,
unique
perspectives),
but the
connection to
diverse and
ethical
perspectives
is unclear.

75.00 %
Partially
reflects on
past
experiences
(background,
unique
perspectives)
and partially
connects
them to
diverse and
ethical
perspectives.

85.00 %
Satisfactorily
reflects on
past
experiences
(background,
unique
perspectives)
and how they
connect to
diverse and
ethical
perspectives.

100.00 %
Thoroughly
reflects on
past
experiences
(background,
unique
perspectives)
and how they
connect to
diverse and
ethical
perspectives.
Provides
concrete
examples to
support
reflection.

SOC101-A3-2
2. Identifies
relevant
sociological
concepts that
tie to the
situation
posed.

0.00 %
Does not
identify
relevant
sociological
concepts that
tie to the
situation
posed.

65.00 %
Insufficiently
identifies the
relevant
sociological
concepts that
tie to the
situation
posed.

75.00 %
Partially
identifies the
relevant
sociological
concepts that
tie to the
situation
posed.

85.00 %
Satisfactorily
identifies the
relevant
sociological
concepts that
tie to the
situation
posed.
References
the scenario
in the
explanation.

100.00 %
Thoroughly
identifies the
relevant
sociological
concepts that
tie to the
situation
posed.
Explains,
using
evidence from
the scenario,
how concepts
are tied to the
situation
posed.

Name

Description

Rubric Detail

Weight
20.00%

Weight
20.00%

8/25/2020 tempSOC10110xcrane

https://blackboard.strayer.edu/webapps/rubric/do/course/manageRubrics?dispatch=view&context=course&rubricId=_859038_1&course_id=_273455_1 2/3

Levels of Achievement

Criteria UnacceptableBelow 60% F
Needs
Improvement
65% D

Fair 75% C Proficient85% B
Exemplary
100% A

SOC101-A3-3
3. Applies
diverse and
ethical
perspectives
to a decision-
making
process.
Provides
specific
examples from
personal
experience or
the scenario
posed.

0.00 %
Does not
apply diverse
or ethical
perspectives
to a decision-
making
process.

65.00 %
Insufficiently
applies
diverse or
ethical
perspectives
to a decision-
making
process.

75.00 %
Partially
applies
diverse or
ethical
perspectives
to a decision-
making
process.
Provides a
specific
example
from
personal
experience
or the
scenario
posed.

85.00 %
Satisfactorily
applies
diverse and
ethical
perspectives
to a decision-
making
process.
Provides a
specific
example from
personal
experience or
the scenario
posed.

100.00 %
Thoroughly
applies
diverse and
ethical
perspectives
to a decision-
making
process.
Provides two
or more
specific
examples
from personal
experience or
the scenario
posed.

SOC101-A3-4
4. Articulates
the value of
incorporating
diverse and
ethical
perspectives
when making
decisions.

0.00 %
Does not
articulate the
value of
diverse and
ethical
perspectives.

65.00 %
Insufficiently
articulates the
value of
diverse and
ethical
perspectives.

75.00 %
Partially
articulates
the value of
diverse and
ethical
perspectives.

85.00 %
Satisfactorily
articulates the
value of
incorporating
diverse and
ethical
perspectives
when making
decisions,
using general
examples.

100.00 %
Thoroughly
articulates the
value of
incorporating
diverse and
ethical
perspectives
when making
decisions,
using
concrete
examples to
support the
argument.

Weight
20.00%

Weight
20.00%

8/25/2020 tempSOC10110xcrane

https://blackboard.strayer.edu/webapps/rubric/do/course/manageRubrics?dispatch=view&context=course&rubricId=_859038_1&course_id=_273455_1 3/3

Levels of Achievement

Criteria UnacceptableBelow 60% F
Needs
Improvement
65% D

Fair 75% C Proficient85% B
Exemplary
100% A

SOC101-A3-5
5. Describes
ways to raise
awareness
and
communicate
the
importance of
considering
diverse and
ethical
perspectives.
Includes
concrete
examples from
the identified
problem.

0.00 %
Does not
describe ways
to raise
awareness
and
communicate
the
importance of
considering
diverse and
ethical
perspectives.

65.00 %
Describes
ineffective or
inappropriate
ways to raise
awareness
and
communicate
the
importance of
considering
diverse and
ethical
perspectives.

75.00 %
Describes
general ways
to raise
awareness
and
communicate
the
importance
of
considering
diverse and
ethical
perspectives.

85.00 %
Satisfactorily
describes
ways to raise
awareness
and
communicate
the
importance of
considering
diverse and
ethical
perspectives.
Includes
concrete
examples
from the
identified
problem.

100.00 %
Thoroughly
describes
ways to raise
awareness
and
communicate
the
importance of
considering
diverse and
ethical
perspectives.
Includes
concrete
examples
from the
identified
problem.

SOC101-A3-6
6. Writes in a
professional
manner using
proper
grammar and
spelling.

0.00 %
Writing does
not meet
minimal
standards.
Tone is not
professional.
Wholly lacking
in logic, clarity,
and/or
consistent
formatting.
Contains
many spelling
and/or
grammatical
errors.

65.00 %
Writing meets
minimal
standards.
Tone is not
professional.
Lacks one or
more of logic,
clarity, and/or
consistent
formatting.
May contain
more than 4
spelling
and/or
grammatical
errors.

75.00 %
Writing is
satisfactory.
Tone is
somewhat
professional.
Shows
moderate
logic, clarity,
and/or
consistent
formatting.
May contain
2–4 spelling
and/or
grammatical
errors.

85.00 %
Writing is
mostly good.
Tone is
professional.
Shows logic,
clarity, and
consistent
formatting.
May contain
few or no
spelling
and/or
grammatical
errors.

100.00 %
Writing is
excellent.
Tone is
professional
and
sophisticated.
Shows logic,
clarity, and
consistent
formatting.
Contains no
spelling or
grammatical
errors.

Weight
15.00%

Weight
5.00%