BenchMark Philosophy Of Special Education

Rubic_Print_Format

Course Code Class Code Assignment Title Total Points

SPD-501 SPD-501-O101 Benchmark – Philosophy of Special Education 300.0

Criteria Percentage No Submission (0.00%) Insufficient (69.00%) Approaching (74.00%) Acceptable (87.00%) Target (100.00%) Comments Points Earned

Group 1 100.0%

Purpose of Education 15.0% Not addressed. Includes an inadequate statement regarding the purpose of education. Includes a statement regarding the purpose of education that could be presented more adequately. Includes an adequate statement regarding the purpose of education. Includes a well thought out statement regarding the purpose of education.

Meeting the Learning Needs of Students with Special Needs Using Standards-Based Instruction 15.0% Not addressed. Includes an inadequate personal vision of meeting the learning needs of students with special needs using standards-based instruction. Includes a personal vision of meeting the learning needs of students with special needs using standards-based instruction that could be presented more adequately. Includes an adequate personal vision of meeting the learning needs of students with special needs using standards-based instruction. Includes an insightful personal vision of meeting the learning needs of students with special needs using standards-based instruction.

Ethical Frameworks and Professional Practice Standards (C6.1) 15.0% Not addressed. The statement regarding how ethical frameworks or professional practice will guide professional practice is inadequately presented. The statement regarding how ethical frameworks or professional practice will guide professional practice could be more adequately presented. A statement regarding how ethical frameworks and professional practice will guide professional practice is included. An insightful statement regarding how ethical frameworks and professional practice will guide professional practice is included.

Resources 15.0% Not addressed. The types of resources teachers should seek are inadequate to continually deepen understanding of cultural, ethnic, gender, and learning differences among students. The types of resources teachers should seek are adequate to continually deepen understanding of cultural, ethnic, gender, and learning differences among students. The types of resources teachers should seek are appropriate to continually deepen understanding of cultural, ethnic, gender, and learning differences among students. The types of resources teachers should seek are ideally suited to continually deepen understanding of cultural, ethnic, gender, and learning differences among students.

Professional Activities or Learning Communities (C6.4; NV 6.4) 15.0% Not addressed. Includes professional activities or learning communities that would not facilitate lifelong learning. Includes professional activities or learning communities that could be better suited to facilitate lifelong learning. Includes professional activities or learning communities that well-suited to facilitate lifelong learning. Includes professional activities or learning communities that ideally suited to facilitate lifelong learning.

Organization 10.0% Not addressed. An attempt is made to organize the content, but the sequence is indiscernible. The ideas presented are compartmentalized; may not relate to each other. The content could be organized better even though it provides the audience with a sense of the main idea. The content is logically organized. The ideas presented relate to each other. The content provides the audience with a clear sense of the main idea. The content is well organized and logical. There is a sequential progression of ideas that relate to each other. The content is presented as a cohesive unit and provides the audience with a clear sense of the main idea.

Research Citations and Format 5.0% Not addressed. Many citations are missing where needed; or many of the sources are inappropriate for the submission; or APA is attempted where required, but many aspects are missing or mistaken. Some citations may be missing or do not completely support the submission. References page may include errors. Some sources may not be appropriate for the submission. All sources are credible, adequate, and support the submission. All required aspects of APA format are correct within the submission. All sources are credible, appropriate, and strongly support the submission. All required aspects of APA format are correct within the submission.

Mechanics (spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use) 10.0% Not addressed. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction are used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present but are not overly distracting to the reader; or inconsistent language or word choice is present; or sentence structure could be more varied. Submission includes some mechanical errors, but they do not hinder comprehension. Varieties of effective sentence structures are used, as well as some practice and content-related language. Submission is virtually free of mechanical errors. Word choice reflects well-developed use of practice and content-related language. Sentence structures are varied and engaging.

Total Weightage 100%