CASE STUDY – SECURITY

Unacceptable Needs Improvement Competent Exemplary

Analyze the new system and determine the design issues
with this new system.

0 (0.00%)
Did not submit or incompletely analyzed the new system and
did not submit or incompletely determined the design issues
with this new system.

11.25 (11.25%)
Partially analyzed the new system and partially determined
the design issues with this new system.

12.75 (12.75%)
Satisfactorily analyzed the new system and satisfactorily
determined the design issues with this new system.

15 (15.00%)
Thoroughly analyzed the new system and thoroughly
determined the design issues with this new system.

Describe how you would correct the design issues with
the system to make the restaurant managers happy.

0 (0.00%)
d not submit or incompletely described how you would
correct the design issues with the system to make the
restaurant managers happy.

11.25 (11.25%)
Partially described how you would correct the design issues
with the system to make the restaurant managers happy.

12.75 (12.75%)
DiPartially described how you would correct the design
issues with the system to make the restaurant managers
happy.

15 (15.00%)
Thoroughly described how you would correct the design
issues with the system to make the restaurant managers
happy.

Create a design plan that lists and explains the tasks
associated with improving this interface.

0 (0.00%)
Did not submit or incompletely created a design plan that lists
and explains the tasks associated with improving this
interface.

2.25 (2.25%)
Partially created a design plan that lists and explains the
tasks associated with improving this interface.

2.55 (2.55%)
Satisfactorily created a design plan that lists and explains the
tasks associated with improving this interface.

3 (3.00%)
Thoroughly created a design plan that lists and explains the
tasks associated with improving this interface.

Create a design plan that contains at least six tasks. 0 (0.00%)
Did not submit or incompletely created a design plan that
contains at least six tasks.

2.25 (2.25%)
Partially created a design plan that contains at least six
tasks.

2.55 (2.55%)
Satisfactorily created a design plan that contains at least six
tasks.

3 (3.00%)
Thoroughly created a design plan that contains at least six
tasks.

Create a design plan that includes realistic time
estimates for each task to be completed.

0 (0.00%)
Did not submit or incompletely created a design plan that
includes realistic time estimates for each task to be
completed.

2.25 (2.25%)
Partially created a design plan that includes realistic time
estimates for each task to be completed.

2.55 (2.55%)
Satisfactorily created a design plan that includes realistic
time estimates for each task to be completed.

3 (3.00%)
Thoroughly created a design plan that includes realistic time
estimates for each task to be completed.

Create a design plan that analyzes the development of
the system in your plan.

0 (0.00%)
Did not submit or incompletely created a design plan that
analyzes the development of the system in your plan.

1.5 (1.50%)
Partially created a design plan that analyzes the
development of the system in your plan.

1.7 (1.70%)
Satisfactorily created a design plan that analyzes the
development of the system in your plan.

2 (2.00%)
Thoroughly created a design plan that analyzes the
development of the system in your plan.

Create a design plan that analyzes the testing of the
system in your plan.

0 (0.00%)
Did not submit or incompletely created a design plan that
analyzes the testing of the system in your plan.

1.5 (1.50%)
Partially created a design plan that analyzes the testing of
the system in your plan.

1.7 (1.70%)
Satisfactorily created a design plan that analyzes the testing
of the system in your plan.

2 (2.00%)
Thoroughly created a design plan that analyzes the testing of
the system in your plan.

Create a design plan that analyzes the implementation of
the system in your plan.

0 (0.00%)
Did not submit or incompletely created a design plan that
analyzes the implementation of the system in your plan.

1.5 (1.50%)
Partially created a design plan that analyzes the
implementation of the system in your plan.

1.7 (1.70%)
Satisfactorily created a design plan that analyzes the
implementation of the system in your plan.

2 (2.00%)
Thoroughly created a design plan that analyzes the
implementation of the system in your plan.

Examine how this system balanced security and
usability, and explain the challenges of incorporating
system security and system usability into a design.

0 (0.00%)
Did not submit or incompletely examined how this system
balanced security and usability and did not submit or
incompletely explained the challenges of incorporating
system security and system usability into a design.

11.25 (11.25%)
Partially examined how this system balanced security and
usability and partially explained the challenges of
incorporating system security and system usability into a
design.

12.75 (12.75%)
Satisfactorily examined how this system balanced security
and usability and satisfactorily explained the challenges of
incorporating system security and system usability into a
design.

15 (15.00%)
Thoroughly examined how this system balanced security and
usability and thoroughly explained the challenges of
incorporating system security and system usability into a
design.

Suggest changes that could be made to the security of
this system to still meet security objectives but make the
system more usable.

0 (0.00%)
Did not submit or incompletely suggested changes that could
be made to the security of this system to still meet security
objectives but make the system more usable.

11.25 (11.25%)
Partially suggested changes that could be made to the
security of this system to still meet security objectives but
make the system more usable.

12.75 (12.75%)
Satisfactorily suggested changes that could be made to the
security of this system to still meet security objectives but
make the system more usable.

15 (15.00%)
Thoroughly suggested changes that could be made to the
security of this system to still meet security objectives but
make the system more usable.

Use Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative, Dia, to
create a graphical representation of your proposed
interface.

0 (0.00%)
Did not submit or incompletely used Microsoft Visio or an
open source alternative, Dia, to create a graphical
representation of your proposed interface.

7.5 (7.50%)
Partially used Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative,
Dia, to create a graphical representation of your proposed
interface.

8.5 (8.50%)
Satisfactorily used Microsoft Visio or an open source
alternative, Dia, to create a graphical representation of your
proposed interface.

10 (10.00%)
Thoroughly used Microsoft Visio or an open source
alternative, Dia, to create a graphical representation of your
proposed interface.

Three references. 0 (0.00%)
No references provided.

3.75 (3.75%)
Does not meet the required number of references; some or
all references poor-quality choices.

4.25 (4.25%)
Meets number of required references; all references high-
quality choices.

5 (5.00%)
Exceeds number of required references; all references high-
quality choices.

Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements. 0 (0.00%)
More than 6 errors present.

7.5 (7.50%)
5-6 errors present.

8.5 (8.50%)
3-4 errors present.

10 (10.00%)
0-2 errors present.

Name: w07a1

Description: w07a1 – Case Study – Security
ExitExit

Grid View List View

Name:w07a1

Description:w07a1 – Case Study – Security
ExitExit