cyb505

Rubic_Print_Format

Course Code Class Code Assignment Title Total Points

CYB-505 CYB-505-O500 Perform a Digital Investigation 310.0

Criteria Percentage Unsatisfactory (0.00%) Less Than Satisfactory (74.00%) Satisfactory (79.00%) Good (87.00%) Excellent (100.00%) Comments Points Earned

Criteria 100.0%

Passive Open Source Intelligence (OSINT) Investigation Documenting and Using Screen Capture to Prove Each Step 20.0% The student does not perform an OSINT investigation documenting and using screen captures to prove each step. The student performs an OSINT investigation documenting and uses screen captures to prove each step, but the information is given in an overly generalized way and may contain errors or missing components. The student performs an OSINT investigation documenting and uses screen captures to prove each step, but the information is a surface-level explanation. The student performs an OSINT investigation documenting and uses screen captures to prove each step. Analysis is direct, competent, and appropriate. Passive Open Source Intelligence (OSINT) Investigation Documenting and Using Screen Capture to Prove Each Step 20% The student does not perform an OSINT investigation documenting and using screen captures to prove each step. The student performs an OSINT investigation documenting and uses screen captures to prove each step, but the information is given in an overly generalized way and may contain errors or missing components. The student performs an OSINT investigation documenting and uses screen captures to prove each step, but the information is a surface-level explanation. The student performs an OSINT investigation documenting and uses screen captures to prove each step. Analysis is direct, competent, and appropriate. The student thoughtfully performs an OSINT investigation documenting and uses screen captures to prove each step, and does so in a comprehensive and insightful way.

Report the Findings of the Investigation 20.0% The student does not report the findings of the investigation. The student reports the findings of the investigation, providing the step-by-step process and including facts only (no recommendations or personal thoughts), but the information is given in an overly generalized way and may contain errors or missing components. The student reports the findings of their investigation, providing the step-by-step process including facts only, no recommendation or personal thoughts, but the information is a surface-level explanation. The student clearly reports the findings of the investigation, providing the step-by-step process and including facts only (no recommendations or personal thoughts). Analysis is direct, competent, and appropriate. The student thoughtfully reports the findings of the investigation, providing the step-by-step process and including facts only (no recommendations or personal thoughts), and does so in a comprehensive and insightful way.

Moral and Ethical Implications 15.0% The student does not consider the ethical and moral implications of sharing information he or she finds from the perspective of the Christian worldview. The student considers the ethical and moral implications of sharing information he or she finds from the perspective of the Christian worldview, but the information is given in an overly generalized way and may contain errors or missing components. The student considers the ethical and moral implications of sharing information he or she finds from the perspective of the Christian worldview, but the information is a surface-level explanation. The student clearly considers the ethical and moral implications of sharing information he or she finds from the perspective of the Christian worldview. Analysis is direct, competent, and appropriate. The student thoughtfully considers the ethical and moral implications of sharing information he or she finds from the perspective of the Christian worldview, and does so in a comprehensive and insightful way.

Privacy in the digital age 15.0% The student does not discuss privacy in the digital age. The student researches privacy but the information is given in an overly generalized way and may contain errors or missing components. The student researches privacy but the information is a surface-level explanation. The student identifies privacy in the digital age, reflection is direct, competent, and appropriate. The student thoughtfully considers privacy and does so in a comprehensive and insightful way.

Vertical and horizontal privacy 15.0% The student does not discuss vertical and horizontal. The student researches vertical or horizontal privacy but the information is given in an overly generalized way and may contain errors or missing components. The student researches vertical and horizontal privacy but the information is a surface-level explanation. The student identifies both vertical and horizontal privacy reflection is direct, competent, and appropriate. The student thoughtfully considers vertical and horizontal privacy and does so in a comprehensive and insightful way.

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 5.0% Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) 5.0% Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. All format elements are correct.

Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 5.0% Sources are not documented. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

Total Weightage 100%