CJUS 701
Discussion: Sweden’s Criminal Justice System Grading Rubric
Criteria
Levels of Achievement
Content
(70%)
Advanced
92-100%
Proficient
84-91%
Developing
1-83%
Not Present
Total
Content Mastery
64.25 to 70 points:
· Original post display clear content mastery, and relate precisely to the assigned topic.
· Two (2) Reply Posts display the addition of new ideas, analysis, and/or moving the topic forward.
58.75 to 64 points:
· Original post are related to the assigned topic, but do not provide evidence of subject mastery.
· Two (2) Reply Posts are related to the original post but are not as developed with respect to the addition of new ideas, analysis, and/or moving the topic forward.
1 to 58.5 points:
· Original post are loosely related to the assigned topic, and do not effectively contribute to the development of the discussion. Posts display a minimal or superficial understanding of the topic.
· Missing a reply and/or Reply Posts are unrelated to the other students’ original post or lack the addition of new ideas, analysis, and/or moving the topic forward.
0 points
Not present
Clarity & Support
64.25 to 70 points:
· Original post are balanced in their approach to the topic, and provide evidence of a clear, well-researched position on the topic.
· Reply posts (2) are balanced in their approach to the topic, and provide evidence of a clear, well-researched position on the topic in the context of a reply post.
58.75 to 64 points:
· Original post are mostly balanced, but do not provide evidence of a firm position derived from research or current literature.
· Reply posts (2) are mostly balanced, but do not provide evidence of a firm position derived from research or current literature in the context of a reply post.
1 to 58.5 points:
· Original post show a clear bias, or do not provide a discernable position on the issue. Evidence of research is not present.
· Reply posts (2) show a clear bias, or do not provide a discernable position on the issue. Evidence of research is not present.
· Additionally, student should concentrate on how to respectfully approach differing opinions.
0 points
Not present
Structure (30%)
Advanced
92-100%
Proficient
84-91%
Developing
1-83%
Not Present
Total
Grammar & Spelling
16.5 to 18 points:
· Correct spelling and grammar used throughout essay.
· Post contains fewer than 4 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content.
15.25 to 16.25 points:
· Post contains fewer than 8 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content.
· Few errors (4-5) noted in the interpretation or execution of proper current APA format.
1 to 15 points:
· Posts contains fewer than 10 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content.
· Numerous errors (6+) noted in the interpretation or execution of proper current APA format.
0 points
Not present
Current APA Format
16.5 to 18 points:
Minimal errors (1-3) noted in the interpretation or execution of proper current APA format.
15.25 to 16.25 points:
Few errors (4-5) noted in the interpretation or execution of proper current APA format.
1 to 15 points:
Numerous errors (6+) noted in the interpretation or execution of proper current APA format.
0 points
Not present
Word Length
11 to 12 points:
Minimum word count of 800 (800 to 1,200 word count) words for the initial thread and 250 words for each reply.
10.25 to 10.75 points:
Minimum word count for each post is within 90% of the word count requirement.
1 to 10 points:
Minimum word count for each post is within 80% of the word count requirement.
0 points
Not present
Sources
11 to 12 points:
· Initial post includes five unique, relevant scholarly references. Student may judiciously use .gov (CIA/FBI/State Department, and the like) references as their scholarly sources.
· Each reply post should have at least one scholarly reference or gov (CIA/FBI/State Department, and the like).
10.25 to 10.75 points:
References to outside sources is within 90% of the minimum requirement (Requirement: 7 minimum – 5 original and 1 each for the replies).
1 to 10 points:
· Sources referenced are not scholarly or relevant.
· Or, references to outside sources is within 80% of the minimum requirement (Requirement: 7 minimum – 5 original and 1 each for the replies).
Professor Comments:
Total:
/200
Page 1 of 3
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more