Forced Migrations – the Domestic Slave Trade

Work type: Research paper
Format: Chicago / Turabian
Pages: 3 pages ( 825 words, Double spaced
Writer deadline: 19 h
Academic level: Undergrad. (yrs 1-2)
Subject or discipline: Other : History 121
Title: Outline – Part 2: Forced Migrations – the Domestic Slave Trade
Number of sources: 5
Paper instructions:
Purpose :
Now that you have a solid thesis with strong, unified topic sentences, you are ready to develop a detailed sentence outline for your project. This outline will serve as the content for your research project presentation.

Directions :
Your outline will include:

Your complete introduction which includes your thesis
The Body of your paper that will include your topic sentences, supporting evidences, explanations and analysis for each topic sentence, as well as in-text citations
Your Conclusion
Your bibliography.
Preparing a detailed sentence outline before designing your project presentation will help you present your research in an organized and productive way.

Save, read, and use the following template to help you create your outline ArgumentAnalysisSentenceOutlineTemplate.docx Download ArgumentAnalysisSentenceOutlineTemplate.docx

Review the Following resources to help you become a better writer:

Helpful Video on Paragraph Unity:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bXOiS0Yq_Qg (Links to an external site.)

How to include Evidence in your Paper: https://drive.google.com/file/d/15jXG-REOm7b9Y-CrWKjiN_wh7TXWPG3Q/view (Links to an external site.)

Grading :
This assignment is worth 30 points.

Library Guide (Links to an external site.) Click Here for – Disability Services (DSS) (Links to an external site.) Click Here -NOVA Policies (Links to an external site.) (Links to an external site.)Canvas Help (Links to an external site.)
Rubric
American Political Prints Outline
American Political Prints Outline
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReasoning and Analysis
10 to >9.0 pts
Exemplary
Strong Analysis. Formulates a plausible interpretation, argument, or claim based on the evaluation of evidence. Clear and accurate answers; insightful, specific.
9 to >8.0 pts
Good
Analysis is strong. Reasons support answers with one important reason overlooked. Generates a reasonable interpretation, argument, or claim based on an evaluation of the evidence
8 to >5.0 pts
Proficient
Analysis is attempted. Reasons support answers with some or an important reason(s) overlooked. Generates a reasonable interpretation, argument, or claim based on an evaluation of the evidence.
5 to >2.0 pts
Needs Improvement
Analysis needs to be enlarged. Reasons are missing important evidence or arguments. States an interpretation, argument, or claim that may or may not based on evidence.
2 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
Weak reasons and/or irrelevant or confusing reasons given that don’t support the answers; incomplete answers. Does not state an original claim, argument, or interpretation
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeComparisons
5 pts
Exemplary
Student makes insightful comparisons, noting accurately the similarities and differences between the sources. statements are written clearly and fully, showing higher level analysis and synthesis of concepts and uses course vocabulary. Student compares multiple articles from each county
4 pts
Good
Student makes comparisons, noting some similarities and differences between the sources. Statements are full, but are missing an important element. Student includes a sufficient number of articles from each county.
3 pts
Proficient
Comparisons are missing important similarities or differences and/or is not as concise as needed; limited vocabulary. Too few articles were referenced in the outline.
2 pts
Needs Improvement
Too few comparisons. Statements are not as detailed and/or concise as needed; and/ or use limited course vocabulary. Relies too much on one county’s sources over the other.
1 pts
Below Expectations
False comparisons are made and/or too few similarities and differences are noted. Misuses or uses limited course vocabulary.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAccuracy of Facts and Citations
5 pts
Exemplary
All facts are accurate and relate back to the answer. Excellent use of examples and facts from the sources. Provided 4-5 specific examples throughout the outline.
4 pts
Good
All facts are accurate and relate back to the answer, yet contained unsupported statements or inaccuracies. Provided 3-4 examples throughout the outline.
3 pts
Proficient
Most facts are accurate, yet there was a disproportionate amount of unsupported statements or incorrect examples from the sources. Provided 1-3 examples throughout the outline.
2 pts
Needs Improvement
Contains too many unsupported statements and few facts or examples from the sources. no citations or references to facts in the sources provided.
1 pts
Below Expectations
No direct quotes or examples from the sources. Incorrect facts and / or citations.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics and Organization
5 pts
Exemplary
Use of correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation; Outline is well organized; one idea follows another in a logical sequence.
4 pts
Good
A few errors but does not distract the reader; posting needs to be expanded to fully address the topic.
3 pts
Proficient
Multiple errors that distract the reader. Outline needed to be expanded.
2 pts
Needs Improvement
Enough errors to distract the reader or hinder the argument; organization problems; outline needs to be expanded
1 pts
Below Expectations
Numerous errors, paper hard to read; outline is too short
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRelevancy
5 pts
Exemplary
Outline is on time
4 pts
Needs Improvement
Outline is a day late
2 pts
Late
Outline is 2-3 days late
0 pts
Below Expectations
Outline is over 4 days late
5 pts