MHW632 Childhood Experiences Essay

MHW632 Childhood Experiences EssayChoose a celebrity, musician, child star (Demi Lovato, Drew Barrymore, Oprah, Tyler Perry, Mark Wahlberg, Eminem, etc.), who has overcome significant adversity. In a 500-750-word essay, answer the following prompts:Briefly describe the childhood experience of the selected celebrity. How did the socioeconomic status affect his/her parents’ behavior?
Identify risk and protective factors that contributed to the selected celebrity’s resilience and celebrity status.
Identify ways in which his/her physical and emotional needs were both met and not met.
Explain how the celebrity’s adverse childhood experience affected their attitude toward parenting behaviors.
What interventions could have been implemented that might have made a difference?
Cite two to four scholarly resources to support your essay.Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide. An abstract is not required.This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.Rubic_Print_FormatCourse CodeClass CodeAssignment TitleTotal PointsMHW-632MHW-632-O500Childhood Experiences Essay90.0CriteriaPercentageUnsatisfactory (0.00%)Less than Satisfactory (74.00%)Satisfactory (79.00%)Good (87.00%)Excellent (100.00%)CommentsPoints EarnedContent70.0%Childhood Experience10.0%Essay omits or incompletely describes the childhood experience of the selected celebrity and how the socioeconomic status affected his/her parents’ behavior. Essay does not demonstrate understanding of the topic.Essay inadequately describes the childhood experience of the selected celebrity and how the socioeconomic status affected his/her parents’ behavior, but description is weak and missing evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates a poor understanding of the topic.Essay adequately describes the childhood experience of the selected celebrity and how the socioeconomic status affected his/her parents’ behavior, but description is limited and lacks some evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic.Essay clearly describes the childhood experience of the selected celebrity and how the socioeconomic status affected his/her parents’ behavior, and description is strong with sound analysis and some evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates an understanding that extends beyond the surface of the topic.Essay expertly describes the childhood experience of the selected celebrity and how the socioeconomic status affected his/her parents’ behavior, and description is comprehensive and insightful with relevant evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.Risk and Protective Factors10.0%Essay omits or incompletely describes risk and protective factors that contributed to the selected celebrity’s resilience and celebrity status. Essay does not demonstrate understanding of the topic.Essay inadequately describes risk and protective factors that contributed to the selected celebrity’s resilience and celebrity status, but description is weak and missing evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates a poor understanding of the topic.Essay adequately describes risk and protective factors that contributed to the selected celebrity’s resilience and celebrity status, but description is limited and lacks some evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic.Essay clearly describes risk and protective factors that contributed to the selected celebrity’s resilience and celebrity status, and description is strong with sound analysis and some evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates an understanding that extends beyond the surface of the topic.Essay expertly describes risk and protective factors that contributed to the selected celebrity’s resilience and celebrity status, and description is comprehensive and insightful with relevant evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.Physical and Emotional Needs10.0%Essay omits or incompletely describes ways in which his/her physical and emotional needs were both met and not met. Essay does not demonstrate understanding of the topic.Essay inadequately describes ways in which his/her physical and emotional needs were both met and not met, but description is weak and missing evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates a poor understanding of the topic.Essay adequately describes ways in which his/her physical and emotional needs were both met and not met, but description is limited and lacks some evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic.Essay clearly describes ways in which his/her physical and emotional needs were both met and not met, and description is strong with sound analysis and some evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates an understanding that extends beyond the surface of the topic.Essay expertly describes ways in which his/her physical and emotional needs were both met and not met, and description is comprehensive and insightful with relevant evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.Adverse Childhood Experiences20.0%Essay omits or incompletely describes how the celebrity’s adverse childhood experience affected their attitude toward parenting behaviors. Essay does not demonstrate understanding of the topic.Essay inadequately describes how the celebrity’s adverse childhood experience affected their attitude toward parenting behaviors, but description is weak and missing evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates a poor understanding of the topic.Essay adequately describes how the celebrity’s adverse childhood experience affected their attitude toward parenting behaviors, but description is limited and lacks some evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic.Essay clearly describes how the celebrity’s adverse childhood experience affected their attitude toward parenting behaviors, and description is strong with sound analysis and some evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates an understanding that extends beyond the surface of the topic.Essay expertly describes how the celebrity’s adverse childhood experience affected their attitude toward parenting behaviors, and description is comprehensive and insightful with relevant evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.Interventions20.0%Essay omits or incompletely describes what interventions could have been implemented that might have made a difference. Essay does not demonstrate understanding of the topic.Essay inadequately describes what interventions could have been implemented that might have made a difference, but description is weak and missing evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates a poor understanding of the topic.Essay adequately describes what interventions could have been implemented that might have made a difference, but description is limited and lacks some evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic.Essay clearly describes what interventions could have been implemented that might have made a difference, and description is strong with sound analysis and some evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates an understanding that extends beyond the surface of the topic.Essay expertly describes what interventions could have been implemented that might have made a difference, and description is comprehensive and insightful with relevant evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.Organization & Effectiveness20.0%Thesis Development and Purpose7.0%Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.Argument Logic and Construction8.0%Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)5.0%Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.Format10.0%Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)5.0%Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.All format elements are correct.Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)5.0%Sources are not documented.Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.Total Weightage100%