For information only – this document does not form part of the student contract
For information only – this document does not form part of the student contract
SINO-BRITISH COLLEGE
&
HUDDERSFIELD BUSINESS SCHOOL
Logistics, Marketing, Hospitality and Analytics
Research Methods
BRA BHH 4021
MODULE HANDBOOK
2020 – 2021
CONTENTS
This handbook provides information about the module and its operation. Please study it carefully.
Section
1
INTRODUCTION / WELCOME
2
MODULE SPECIFICATION
3
THE MODULE TEAM
4
DELIVERY INFORMATION
4.1
Delivery schedule
4.2
Printing policy
4.3
Seminar/Tutorial preparation
4.4
Availability of Course Materials for Timetabled Sessions
4.5
Module specific attendance requirements
5
ASSESSMENT INFORMATION
5.1
The assessment strategy
5.2
Assessment deadlines
5.3
Process for requesting an extension or submitting a claim for Extenuating Circumstances (ECs)
5.4
Formative assessment
5.5
Arrangements for the return of work and feedback
6
GENERAL INFORMATION
6.1
Academic integrity and referencing information
6.2
Further reading
6.3
Access to facilities
6.4
Health and Safety information
6.5
Learning Development Group (LDG)
For information only – this document does not form part of the student contract
For information only – this document does not form part of the student contract
1
INTRODUCTION / WELCOME
Welcome to the year-long module of Research Methods. This module is required for students to graduate from the Events Management Program. Students will learn about research, data collection and analysis, writing and develop their critical thinking skills. The module helps students develop a number of practical skills such as time management, communication and teamwork skills (due to interaction with supervisor supervisor) and creativity. To complete this module, students will complete an entire dissertation by themselves, which will be their biggest single assessment to date.
2
MODULE SPECIFICATION
The module specification document can be found under the Key Items Tab on Brightspace.
3
THE MODULE TEAM
The address for the Department within which your module is situated is:
The Sino-British College
1195 Fuxing Middle Rd
XuHui District
Shanghai, 200031
Staff involved in the organisation and delivery of this module are listed below and are also displayed within Brightspace.
Contact Information
Office
Contact Details
Lee Henderson
Module Leader
T612
Joe Chen
Module Tutor
T616
School Administrator
Kelly Li
S601
You can normally expect academic staff to be available in their offices at the times displayed on the notices outside their rooms – you do not need an appointment to meet with staff during these times.
**Some part-time members of staff do not have a fixed office, please contact them by e-mail**
Education Services
The Education Services Team has responsibility for providing a full and responsive administrative service in support of the processes and procedures associated with student and course administration. If you have a problem in accessing systems for results, Brightspace or issues with your module, please contact [email protected]
Module Leader
The Module Leader is responsible for the academic leadership, management and assessment of the module.
To ensure that the Module Leader and Module Tutors are available to assist you with academic matters (such as clarification on material covered in class, guidance on the interpretation of assessment briefs, associated criteria, and feedback on work submitted), please ensure that all other queries are directed to Programme Leader.
Academic References
Tutors can provide academic references. Should you wish to request an academic reference, please do so by emailing tutors directly, ensuring that you provide the information required by the institution/company/job role for which you are applying.
4
DELIVERY INFORMATION
4.1
Delivery schedule
The delivery schedule follows the RM PPT and supervisor
4.2
Printing policy
It is the student’s responsibility to ensure they access these materials in a timely enough manner in order to support their engagement with the course.
4.3
Seminar/Tutorial preparation
Seminars/tutorials will be student lead. All work done in the tutorial will be based on incrementally developing the student’s assignments for submittal (PR1, Proposal, Dissertation). Students should be expected to bring their laptop and draft assignment work to develop in every tutorial session.
4.4
Availability of Course Materials for Timetabled Sessions
The University will normally make materials required for timetabled sessions prior to the session via the University’s VLE. It is the student’s responsibility to ensure they access these materials in a timely enough manner in order to support their engagement with the course.
4.5
Attendance requirements
As a registered student of the University, you are expected to attend your scheduled classes. If you miss classes or are late, your absence will be noted and you may find that you have to explain your poor attendance. Continued poor attendance will lead to exclusion from your course.
For full details on how to register your attendance and report any periods of absence, please refer to your course handbook.
If there are any specific attendance requirements in excess of the University’s usual Attendance Monitoring Policy these should be listed here (e.g. involvement in group work)
5
ASSESSMENT INFORMATION
5.1
The assessment strategy
The assessment strategy is as follows:
· PR1 Form-(no mark awarded)
· Proposal (Extended Abstract) – (20% of final mark)-available for tutor re-assessment-marked by your supervisor.
· Dissertation (80% of final mark)-available for tutor re-assessment-marked by your supervisor.
Honours awards
Non-Honours awards
Pass
40%
40%
Refer
30-39%
30-39%
Module Grading Bands
A
70% +
A
70% +
B
60-69%
B
60-69%
C
50-59%
C
50-59%
D
40-49%
R***
35-49%
R/F**
30-39%
F***
0-49%
F**
0-39%
Award Classification Bands
Distinction
69.5%
Distinction
69.5%
Merit
59.5%
Merit
59.5%
Pass
40%
Pass
50%
5.2
Assessment brief & deadlines
Element of assessment
Submission method
Submission date
Receipt issued
Date work and
feedback returned
PR1 Form
Turnitin
19/10/2020
Yes
– 3 term time weeks after date of submission
Proposal (Extended Abstract)
Turnitin
16/11/2020
Yes
– 3 term time weeks after date of submission
Dissertation
Turnitin
26 /04/2021
Yes
– More than 3 term time weeks after date of submission
It is important that you keep a copy of all of the work you submit for assessment. You are strongly advised to use an electronic storage system as well as a back up.
It is School policy that all assessed work must be submitted electronically via Turnitin, by 15:00 on the published date of submission.
When submitting your assessment via Turnitin, it is important that you name your document in the following way: Module Code_Title of assessment
For example: BME0054_Economic assessment of an SME
Further guidance on submitting assessments through Turnitin, can be found when you log in to Brightspace. From Huddersfield School homepage there will be a link to “Brightspace Support”. You then need to select “Assessment” then from the sub menu “How to submit an assignment”.
There will also be a large number of other support materials to include accessing reading lists, using communication tools, navigating a module, E-portfolio and the Brightspace teams contact details for further information.
No hard copies should be submitted unless this is identified as a requirement in the Assessment Brief. Where hard copies are required, please ensure the work submitted is stapled in the top left hand corner, not submitted in folders or ring binders and your student ID number and name are clearly visible on the assessment. Details of where hard copy work would be submitted will be provided by the module tutor. Electronic submissions should also be submitted via Turnitin before the 15:00 deadline.
If you are not able to submit by the deadline, you must inform your Course Leader. Depending on the circumstances, you may need to ask for an extension or submit an extenuating circumstances form – see Section 5.5 below.
Assessed work which is submitted late but within five working days of the agreed submission date will be accepted and the maximum mark available for that piece of assessment will be capped at the minimum pass mark. Please note that loss of data or printing error are not deemed to be acceptable reasons for the late submission of work.
This does not apply to the submission of assessed work relating to Tutor Reassessment, referral or deferral requirements but does apply to previously agreed extended or renegotiated deadlines. Work submitted later than this without an approved extension will receive a mark of 0%.
Assessment Brief:
Please see appendix A for the assessment details.
Tutor Reassessment
Tutor Reassessment (TR) is where a student is given a single opportunity to re-submit an eligible piece of work and for it to be remarked prior to the meeting of the Course Assessment Board. Tutor reassessment will only be offered if you submit a piece of work for the original assessment and achieve a mark within the specified referral range. The maximum mark for a successful Tutor Re-assessment will be capped at the minimum pass mark. An EC claim cannot be submitted for an assessment that has been offered as a Tutor Reassessment.
The full regulations for tutor reassessment can be found in Section E in the University’s Regulations for Awards (taught courses).
As indicated in section 5.1 of this handbook, the following piece(s) of assessment are eligible for tutor reassessment:
Element of assessment
Submission method
TR submission date
Receipt issued
Date work and feedback returned
Proposal (Extended Abstract)
BrightSpace Turnitin
18/01/2021
Yes
08/02/2021 – 3 term time weeks after date of submission
Dissertation
BrightSpace Turnitin
28/06/2021
Yes
19/07/2021 – 3 term time weeks after date of submission
Students will be advised they are eligible for reassessment through email communication from their supervisor and module leader. Students will be able to see feedback from the original submitted assignment on BrightSpace (Turn It In) and alternatively can see their supervisor in their office hours.
5.3
Process for requesting an extension or submitting a claim for Extenuating Circumstances (ECs)
Deadlines for the submission of assessed work are strictly applied.
Extensions
There are procedures in place for you to request a short extension to a deadline but this request has to be made no later than two working days after the published submission date. If you have difficulties such as a short term illness and need to request an extension, you should submit a request to the module leader via email. You have 2 working days from the original assessment date to apply.
Accepted extension grounds include: serious short-term illness (which would result in absence from employment); a long-term health condition worsening; emerging mental health condition; bereavement.
Grounds which are unlikely to be accepted include: wanting more time; minor illness; long-term health conditions for which you are receiving adjustments; holidays; normal financial pressures; transport difficulties; IT difficulties (i.e. IT failure/losing work etc.); multiple deadlines (unless evidenced that deadlines changed at short notice); normal work commitments (evidenced unexpected/unplanned issues can be considered).
Extension requests of up to 2 working days can be considered without evidence.
Requests of 3-10 working days will be considered if there is supporting evidence. Supporting evidence needs to be submitted before any request can be considered.
The maximum extension period that can be granted is normally 10 working days.
Late requests for extensions are not accepted and you run the risk of scoring the minimum pass mark for that piece of work if submitted late but within 5 working days of the original deadline, or 0% if submitted later than this without an approved extension.
Any queries please email [email protected] or visit the Student Guidance & Support area in Brightspace.
Extenuating Circumstances
The University understands that there may be times when your ability to complete a piece of assessed work or to concentrate on your studies may be hindered by factors beyond your control – such as illness or significant personal difficulties. The regulations include a process to allow students who are affected in this way to bring these extenuating circumstances (ECs) to the attention of the relevant people in the School (such as the Course Assessment Board) so that proper account can be taken. Please be aware that a claim for ECs will usually only be accepted where you’ve been able to demonstrate that the circumstances described have had a direct impact on you and were substantial and unexpected – in all other cases students would be expected to negotiate an extension. The regulations for ECs can be found in Section 8 at
http://www.hud.ac.uk/registry/regulationsandpolicies/studentregs
Additionally, the University does operate a ‘fit to sit’ policy for examinations – this means that, by attending an examination, a student is declaring that they are fit to undertake that assessment and it is unlikely that a claim for poor performance will be accepted.
When completing an EC form please be careful to include the correct modules and assessments and to be sure that you attach appropriate and acceptable evidence to your claim.
Once completed your claim has to be submitted to the Student Support Team (CS1/10) within 5 working days of the date by which your assessment should have been completed.
Any queries please email [email protected] or visit the Student Guidance & Support area in Brightspace.
5.4
Formative assessment
Opportunities for students to benefit from formative assessment are based on their engagement with the tutorial exercises and supervisor appointments to receive feedback on their research ideas, draft proposal and dissertation, and related areas of needed development.
5.5
Arrangements for the return of work and feedback
You should normally receive feedback on your assessments three teaching (i.e. term time) weeks after the submission date for the assessment. Dates for the return of work and feedback are indicated within Section 5.2 of this handbook. Feedback should help you understand why you received the mark and what you can do to improve your performance in future assessments.
Once available, feedback on work submitted via Turnitin can be accessed from within Brightspace. Details on how to access feedback on work submitted via alternative means will be provided at the relevant point in the year.
Students can access feedback on their summative assessments via BrightSpace and Turn It In (All feedback will be published). Students may also make appointments to see their supervisor in their available office hours.
6
GENERAL INFORMATION
6.1
Academic misconduct and referencing information
The University regards any action by a student that may result in an unfair academic advantage as a serious offence. It is your responsibility to ensure at all times that the assessments you complete are entirely your own work and that you have used the relevant referencing technique correctly and in full. The full set of regulations which govern Academic Misconduct can be found under Section 10 at http://www.hud.ac.uk/registry/regulationsandpolicies/studentregs/
Further information on academic misconduct, including an overview of the support available for referencing, can be found within your course handbook; it is important that you familiarise yourself with this information.
6.2
Further reading
Further reading for the module of Research Methods is endless.
It is suggested for you to access various scholarly publications (academic books and journals) on the e-library and databases available through The University of Huddersfield and The University of Shanghai for Science and Technology web portals.
6.3
Arrangements for borrowing equipment/accessing labs/studios
If you wish to borrow equipment or gain access to specialist facilities please discuss your requirements with your Course Leader or Year Tutor.
6.4
Aspects of Health and Safety specific to the module
An overview of the Health and Safety arrangements in place can be found within your course handbook.
6.5
Student Success Centre
The Student Success Centre offers study skills support to all students within the SBC School, covering topics such as reading, research, academic writing (including referencing) and reflective practice.
Appendix A
PR1 Assessment Brief
The PR1 template is just an A4 paper that lists the students research ideas. The PR1 is graded as pass or fail (fail means they need to re-do it until they have a satisfactory resea-Marking Requirements-Students must demonstrate in clear coherent writing a problem, issue, trend, phenomena to research with a justification to conduct the research. Regardless of how good or original the research idea is, the module leader must be confident the student can collect the data and complete the research. Remember, no research = no dissertation = no graduation.
Project Development Report (1500 words for BHH4003, BHH4021 and BHT4003 and 1000 words for BHH4013 and BHT4008)
The following headings must be used:
· Proposed Title
This should be concise and informative. It should relate to the topic, theory/theories, geographical location and principal method.
· Rationale for the research topic
Why are you researching this topic? This may include a personal interest, or work experience, but it must relate to gaps in knowledge concerning the topic obtained from the literature.
· Aim & objectives/Research questions
What is your aim and your objectives or research questions? You should have only one aim but 3-5 objectives or research questions. You may also have hypotheses, if the research is quantitative in nature. The aim/objectives/research questions/hypotheses need to be appropriate and clearly formulated.
· Principal literature sources
What key literature have you identified? (books, journal articles and other sources). What theories, concepts and frameworks are relevant to your research? How does this literature help you answer your aim and objectives/research questions?
· Proposed methodology
What research methods are you going to use and why? How are you going to design your research? What ethical issues arise and how are you going to deal with them?
· Relationship to other final year work & pathway title
How does the research topic relate to your course and the final year modules you are studying?
· Your report is to be comprehensively referenced using the APA6 system
· It is to be written in standard, correct English
· You are required to use 1.5 line spacing and Arial size 12 letter-type
The electronic version is to be uploaded onto TurnitinUK assignments on the module’s Brightspace site.
Report Marking Criteria
Unacceptable
Work at this level
-does not address the task set or represents a wholly inadequate attempt
-requires a complete re-write
Unsatisfactory (Refer if required)
Work at this level will demonstrate
-an incomplete answer
-insufficient depth of understanding
-some serious errors and/or major omissions
-a potentially recoverable piece of work
Pass
Work at this level will demonstrate
-limited use of module material
-a basic level of understanding
-a simply descriptive approach
-some errors and omissions
Fair
Work at this level will demonstrate
-generally good use of some of the module material
-reasonable and coherent description of theory
-limited analysis and evaluation
-no major errors
Good
Work at this level will demonstrate
-good use of module material
-ability to compare and contrast material from a variety of relevant sources
-analytical ability underpinning logical argument
-well-structured, clear and consistent presentation, although there may be a few errors
Very Good
Work at this level will demonstrate
-accomplished discussion and application of theory
-clear ability to compare and contrast material from a wide variety of relevant sources
-some synthesis based on critical analysis
-well-structured, clear and coherent presentation, although there may be a few minor errors
Excellent
Work at this level will demonstrate
-a mastery of complex knowledge and ideas
– originality and insight derived from a mature depth of understanding of material that goes well beyond that provided in the module
– creative synthesis arising from critical analysis and evaluation of relevant information
– presentation that is clear, coherent and error free
Outstanding
Work at this level will demonstrate
-a mastery of complex knowledge and ideas
– originality and insight derived from a mature depth of understanding of material that goes well beyond that provided in the module
– creative synthesis arising from critical analysis and evaluation of relevant information
– presentation that is clear, coherent and error free
0-9
10-19
20-29
30-39
40-49
50-59
60-69
70-79
80-89
90-100
Knowledge of Theory, Concepts and Methods
Does not address any relevant theories, concepts or methods
Mentions some terminology relating to relevant theories, concepts or methods
Mentions some terminology relating to relevant theories, concepts or methods wholly inadequate attempt at use or explanation
Mentions some terminology relating to relevant theories, concepts or methods inadequate attempt at use or explanation
Relevant theory, concepts and models used or explained but some aspects may have been missed or misconstrued
Most relevant theories, concepts and models used or explained in an appropriate and straight forward manner with some assumptions and implications recognised
Appropriate selection of relevant theories, concepts and models used or explained insightfully with assumptions, implications and contextualisation recognised
Appropriate selection of relevant theories, concepts and models used or explained insightfully with wide range of assumptions and implications recognised with highly appropriate contextualisation demonstrating excellent understanding
Appropriate selection of relevant theories, concepts and models used or explained innovatively with full range of assumptions and implications recognised with highly appropriate contextualisation demonstrating excellent understanding of complex material
Appropriate selection of relevant theories, concepts and models used or explained innovatively with full range of assumptions and implications recognised with highly appropriate contextualisation demonstrating exceptional understanding of complex material
Scholarship: Evidence of Reading and Research
No evidence presented or what is presented is wholly irrelevant
No evidence presented or what is presented is generally irrelevant
Minimal evidence presented is generally irrelevant or lacking currency
Minimal evidence presented uncritically and lacks evidence of independent research beyond core texts
Evidence of limited but relevant reading which is presented uncritically and tends to use summary description
Evidence of relevant reading which shows clear attempt at independent reading and some attempt at synthesis
Evidence of range of relevant reading generally used critically which shows clear attempt at independent reading and ability to synthesise
Evidence of wide range of relevant reading used critically which shows high degree of independent reading and a strong ability to synthesise
Evidence of the fullest range of relevant reading used critically which shows a very high level of independent reading and an excellent ability to synthesise
Evidence of the fullest range of relevant reading used critically which shows the highest level of independent reading and an outstanding ability to synthesise
Critical Reasoning
No demonstration of critical thought
No demonstration of critical thought
No demonstration of critical thought
No demonstration of critical thought but has potential to be developed
Minimal demonstration of critical thought
Demonstrates critical thought
Often demonstrates critical thought
Consistent application of well integrated critical thought
Consistent application of excellently integrated critical thought
Consistent application of outstandingly integrated critical thought
Use of Evidence: Analysis & Evaluation
Does not analyse or any analysis is irrelevant
Does not analyse or any analysis is irrelevant
Does not analyse but basic concepts are understood
Does not analyse but the potential for analysis is evident. Shows potential to develop arguments.
Demonstrates limited analysis with some development of argument and related evaluation (if applicable)
Demonstrates good ability to analyse and evaluate (if applicable) with arguments developed coherently
Demonstrates very good ability to analyse a range of topics/issues critically. Evaluation is well supported (if applicable). Arguments are well structured and logical.
Demonstrates excellent ability to analyse a range of topics/issues critically and demonstrates ability to question ‘received opinion’. Evaluation is well supported and provides convincing conclusions (if applicable). Arguments are well structured, complex and logical.
Demonstrates excellent ability to analyse a range of topics/issues critically and demonstrates ability to question ‘received opinion’. Evaluation is well supported and provides convincing conclusions (if applicable). Arguments are complex, lucid and persuasive.
Demonstrates outstanding ability to analyse a range of topics/issues critically and demonstrates ability to question ‘received opinion’. Evaluation is well supported and provides convincing conclusions (if applicable). Exceptionally complex, lucid and persuasive arguments.
Clarity of Written Expression
Incoherent and incomprehensible throughout
Largely incomprehensible
Generally comprehensible but language errors generally impede understanding and flow of reading
Language errors often impede understanding and flow of reading
The meaning is clear but contains language errors
Generally fluent and accurate use of grammar and spelling
Consistently fluent and accurate use of grammar and spelling
Consistently fluent and accurate use of grammar and spelling employing appropriate genre
Consistently fluent and accurate use of grammar and spelling employing appropriate genre and excellent expression
Consistently fluent and accurate use of grammar and spelling employing appropriate genre and exceptional expression
Structure
No structure
Structure wholly inappropriate to the task
Structure generally inappropriate to the task
Structure does not meet expectations of the task
Shows sufficient awareness of required general structure
Demonstrates good organisation and awareness of required general structure
Demonstrates consistently logical organisation and awareness of required general structure
Polished and excellently organised; fully meets structural expectations
Polished and excellently organised; fully meets structural expectations and demonstrates a highly imaginative approach
Polished and outstandingly organised; fully meets structural expectations and demonstrates a highly imaginative approach
Presentation of work
Length requirements may not be observed; does not follow academic conventions; language and presentation errors impact on intelligibility
Length requirements may not be observed; does not follow academic conventions; language and presentation errors impact on intelligibility
Length requirements may not be observed; generally does not follow academic conventions; language and/or presentation errors may impact on intelligibility
Length requirement met and academic conventions mostly followed. Minor errors in language or presentation
Length requirement met and academic conventions mostly followed. Possibly very minor errors in language or presentation
Fair standard of presentation; length requirement met and academic conventions followed
Good standards of presentation
Very good standards of presentation
Professional standards of presentation
Highest professional standards of presentation
Originality
No evidence of any attempt at independent thinking
Any attempt at independent thinking is irrelevant
Any attempt at independent thinking is generally irrelevant
Insufficient evidence of independent thinking and development of own ideas
Limited evidence of independent thinking and development of own ideas
Some evidence of independent thinking and development of own ideas
General evidence of independent thinking and development of own ideas
High level of evidence of independent thinking and development of own ideas
Strong evidence of independent thinking and development of own ideas
Outstanding evidence of independent thinking and development of own ideas
0-9
10-19
20-29
30-39
40-49
50-59
60-69
70-79
80-89
90-100
DISSERTATION MARKING SHEET (BHH4003, BHH4021, BHT4003)
Name of Student:
Title of Dissertation:
Name of Marker:
Element:
Weighting/Mark:
Criteria:
APPROACH, STRUCTURE AND STYLE
15%
· Title is clear and informative
· Topic is clearly and concisely introduced and explained
· Summary is clear and informative
· Research is placed in a wider context
· Aim(s) and objectives/research questions are clear
· The conceptual framework is identified and discussed
· Any hypotheses are well-formulated
· Internal structure is logical and informative
· Subtle appreciation of issues
· Extensive, in-depth research
· Good grammar, spelling and use of English
· Appendices are used appropriately
Comments:
Excellent
10.5-15
Very Good
9-10
Good
7.5-8.5
Satisfactory
6-7
Poor (Refer)
4.5-5.5
Unsatisfactory (Fail)
0-4
LITERATURE REVIEW
30%
· Comprehensive and critical analysis of appropriate literature
· Organisation and application of appropriate literature review techniques
· Clarity of argument
· Conforms to appropriate referencing techniques
· Extensive reading of relevant books, journals and other sources
Excellent
21-30
Very Good
18-20
Good
15-17
Satisfactory
12-14
Poor (Refer)
9-11
Unsatisfactory (Fail)
0-8
Comments:
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
30%
· Methods chosen are appropriate to meet aim(s), objectives/research questions and, where appropriate, hypotheses
· Methods chosen are critically justified and evaluated
· The procedure is sufficiently detailed to allow replication
· The effectiveness of the methodology is explained and problems identified are discussed
· Tables and figures are appropriately used
Excellent
21-30
Very Good
18-20
Good
15-17
Satisfactory
12-14
Poor (Refer)
9-11
Unsatisfactory (Fail)
0-8
Comments:
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS
25%
· The interpretation of the results is correct and a critical comparison is made with the conceptual framework
· A correct and logical conclusion is drawn from the data presented, based on a rigorous analysis, and is consistent with the project’s aims and objectives
· Implications for the industry are discussed
· Further directions of research are identified
Excellent
17.5-25
Very Good
15-17
Good
12.5-14
Satisfactory
10-12
Poor (Refer)
7.5-9
Unsatisfactory (Fail)
0-7
Comments:
Overall Mark (%):
Word length Penalty:
No
If YES, % deduction:
TOTAL Mark (%):
Date:
19
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more