Research Article
High Magnitude of Social Anxiety Disorder in
School Adolescents
Kindie Mekuria,1 Haregwoin Mulat,2 Habtamu Derajew,3 Tesfa Mekonen,4
Wubalem Fekadu,4 Amsalu Belete,5 Solomon Yimer,6 Getasew Legas,5 Melak Menberu,7
Asmamaw Getnet,8 and Simegnew Kibret5
1Woldia Hospital, Woldia, Ethiopia
2Psychiatry Department, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia
3Amanuel Mental Specialized Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
4Psychiatry Department, Bahir Dar University, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia
5College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Debre Tabor University, Debre Tabor, Ethiopia
6Psychiatry Department, Dilla University, Dilla, Ethiopia
7College of Health Sciences, Mizan-Tepi University, Mizan-Tepi, Ethiopia
8Finote Selam Hospital, Finote Selam, Ethiopia
Correspondence should be addressed to Amsalu Belete; [email protected]
Received 20 October 2016; Revised 14 January 2017; Accepted 29 January 2017; Published 16 February 2017
Academic Editor: Arif Khan
Copyright © 2017 Kindie Mekuria et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License,
which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Introduction. Social phobia is the most prevalent and chronic type of anxiety disorder worldwide and it affects occupational,
educational, and social affairs of the individual. Social phobia is also known for its association with depression and substance
use disorder. Objective. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence and associated factors of social phobia among high school
students in Ethiopia. Methods. Cross-sectional study was conducted among 386 randomly selected students. Data were collected
using pretested and self-administered questionnaire. Social phobia was assessed by using Social Phobia Inventory (SPIN). Logistic
regression was used to analyze the data with 95% confidence interval and variables with? value less than 0.05 were considered as
statistically significant. Results. From 386 study participants, 106 (27.5%) of them were positive for social phobia. Being female (AOR
= 3.1; 95% CI: 1.82–5.27), current alcohol drinking (AOR = 1.75; 95% CI: 1.03–2.98), poor social support (AOR = 2.40; 95% CI: 1.17–
4.92), and living with single parent (AOR = 5.72; 95% CI: 2.98–10.99) were significantly associated with social phobia. Conclusion.
The proportion of social phobia was higher compared to previous evidences. School-based youth-friendly mental health services
might be helpful to tackle this problem.
1. Introduction
DSM-V defines social phobia as marked or intense fear or
anxiety of social situations in which the individual may be
scrutinized by others and this situation interferes significantly
with routines, occupational (academic) functioning, social
activities, and relationships [1]. Though it is a debilitating
psychiatric condition which is treatable, it often remains
undetected and untreated. Individuals will have reduced
quality of life, disturbed social interactions, poor daily func-
tioning, and poor treatment adherence for other medical or
psychiatric conditions [2–4].
The prevalence of social phobia among school adolescents
varied from country to country [5]. For instance, in high-
income countries, the magnitude ranges from 3.5% to 21% [6–
10]. Even though there is scarcity of evidence in developing
countries, the available literatures suggested that social pho-
bia is higher, which ranges from 10.3% to 27% [11, 12].
Students with social phobia have difficulty of speaking
in front of a group of people and fail or drop out of school
due to fear [13]. Students’ attention to academic information
may be distracted by an excessive focus on their anxiety
[14]. The ability to monitor and modify communication with
colleagues and teachers may be vague by fear of negative
Hindawi
Psychiatry Journal
Volume 2017, Article ID 5643136, 5 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/5643136
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/5643136
2 Psychiatry Journal
evaluation and when participating in a seminar, socially
anxious students judge their competence poorly [15], which
leads to academic underachievement [16].
Evidences showed that social phobia was associated with
20% of cases of adult depression [17] and 17% of cases of alco-
hol and drug dependence [18]. Low socioeconomic status,
being unmarried, unemployment, low level of education, and
poor social support were identified as a risk factor for social
phobia [19]. Society’s attitude towards shyness and avoidance
as a measure of politeness is also an important factor associ-
ated with students’ ability to build social interaction [20].
Despite the high worldwide burden of social phobia,
limited evidence is available, particularly in developing coun-
tries. This study tried to assess factors (social support and
wealth index) which were previously not well addressed.
The purpose of this study was to assess the prevalence and
associated factors of social phobia among school adolescents
in Ethiopia.
2. Methods and Materials
School-based cross-sectional study was conducted at Woldia
preparatory school. A total of 1516 regular students in 11th and
12th grades in 2015 academic year were enrolled. The school is
located in Woldia town, Amhara regional state, 521 kilometers
away from Addis Ababa. There is one general hospital and two
health centers in the town. All students who were enrolled at
Woldia preparatory school in 2014/2015 academic year were
included in the study. The sample size for this study was
calculated by using single population proportion formula and
424 students were recruited randomly.
Social phobia was the dependent variable and the pre-
dictors were sociodemographic variables (sex, age, religion,
wealth index, relationship status, current living condition,
and origin of residence), clinical factors (past history of
psychiatric illness, past history of chronic medical illness,
and family history of mental illness), substance use (cigarette,
Khat chewing, and alcohol use), and social support. Khat
(also called Catha edulis) is a local green leaf plant which had
amphetamine-like stimulating effect after chewing due to the
active ingredient called cathinone.
Data was collected by pretested self-administered ques-
tionnaire and the data collection was facilitated by trained
data collectors and supervisors. Social phobia was assessed by
using the Social Phobia Inventory (SPIN) which is a 17-item
self-rating scale developed by Connor and his colleagues [21].
It shows the symptom domains of social phobia (fear, avoid-
ance, and physiological arousal) and appears to have reliable
and valid psychometric properties of screening social phobia
in adolescents and other populations [21–24]. It was rated
from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely) and the sum score ranged
from 0 to 68 [21]. A student with a score of 20 and above on
SPIN was considered as having social phobia.
Oslo 3-item social support scale was used to determine
the level of social support. The total score ranged from 3 to 14
and was categorized into poor support (3–8 scores), moderate
support (9–11 scores), and strong support (12–14 scores) [25].
Students’ substance use was explained by verbal report of
consuming of any alcohol, cigarette, and Khat in the previous
three months. Presence and absence of major illness (medical
or psychiatric) were also based on report of the participants.
Data were entered by Epi-Info 3.5.3 analyzed by SPSS-21
for Windows version. Factors association was done by run-
ning bivariate and multivariable logistic regression. Strength
of the association was presented by odds ratio with 95%
confidence interval and ? value <0.05 was used to identify
statistically significant variables.
Ethical clearance was obtained from Institutional Review
Board (IRB) of University of Gondar and Amanuel Mental
Specialized Hospital. Confidentiality of the participants was
maintained by anonymous questionnaire. Participants were
fully informed about the purposes of the study prior to the
data collection and informed consent (assent) was obtained.
3. Results
3.1. Sociodemographic Characteristics of Respondents. A total
of 424 students were included in the study, of which 386
completed the questionnaires with the response rate of
91.03%. 233 (60.4%) of the participants were males and 346
(89.6%) were between the ages of 16 and 19 years. The mean
age of the respondents was 18.15± 1.24 years (Table 1).
3.2. Clinical and Psychosocial Characteristics of the Respon-
dents. Fourteen (3.6%) students had past psychiatric history
and 18 (4.7%) of them had family history of mental illness.
About one-third of the participants reported that they did not
use any mass media (Table 2).
3.3. Prevalence and Associated Factors of Social Phobia. The
overall prevalence of social phobia was 27.5%. In multivari-
able logistic regression analysis, sex, current use of alcohol,
social support, and students raised by single parent were
significantly associated with social phobia (Table 3).
4. Discussion
The overall prevalence of social phobia was 27.5% and it
was consistent with the study done elsewhere which was
26.5% [26]. However, the present study was higher than the
study conducted in Nigeria, 9.4% [27], Swedish high school
students, 21% [9], Iran, 6.2% [6], Delhi, 10.3% [11], and china,
14.1% [12], as well as the national comorbidity survey in
USA, 9% [8]. It was also higher compared to a comparative
study among high school students in Egypt, Saudi Arabia,
and United Arab Emirates where the percentages were 13%,
9.8%, and 7.8%, respectively [28]. This discrepancy might be
due to sociocultural differences between those countries and
Ethiopia. For instance, in Ethiopia, shyness as a measure of
politeness has been emphasized as a dominant cultural norm
[23]. The other possible reason for this difference might be
the tool used in the current study, which is nondiagnostic self-
administered tool, and this might overestimate the prevalence
of social phobia among students [21, 22, 24].
In this study, social phobia had significant association
with sex, current alcohol drinking, social support, and stu-
dents’ living status. In female students, the odds of having
social phobia were 3 times more than those of male students
Psychiatry Journal 3
Table 1: Sociodemographic distribution of the respondents (? =
386).
Sociodemographic variables Frequency Percent
Sex
Male 233 60.4
Female 153 39.6
Age
16–19 346 89.6
>19 40 10.4
Relationship status
Single 350 90.4
Married 36 9.6
Ethnicity
Amhara 377 97.7
Others 9 2.3
Religion
Orthodox 304 78.8
Muslim 71 18.4
Protestant 11 2.8
Place of upbringing
Urban 236 61.1
Rural 150 38.9
Lived with
Both parents 267 69.2
Single parent 61 15.8
Relative/alone 58 15
Semester result (performance)
Low 236 61.2
Medium 119 30.8
High 31 8.0
Wealth index
Lowest (poor) 35 9.1
Second 151 39.1
Medium 46 11.9
Fourth 109 28.2
Highest (rich) 45 11.7
Note. Ethnicity (others) = Tigre, 6, and Afar, 3; performance (average
academic score): low≤70, medium = 70–84.99, and high≥85.
and this was supported by the study done in Poland [26] and
Baghdad [29]. The community’s perception towards shyness
and politeness as a measure of predominant cultural norm
might have high influence on female students’ social phobia
status [23]. Students who were current alcohol users were
about 2 times more likely to have social phobia as compared
with their counterparts. Students with social phobia tend
to engage themselves into heavy drinking and alcohol use
problems [30]. This finding was consistent with previous
studies conducted in Nigeria [27] and USA [10]. The students
Table 2: Clinical conditions of respondents (? = 386).
Variables Frequency (?) Percent (%)
Past psychiatric history
Yes 14 3.6
No 372 96.4
Family psychiatric history
Yes 18 4.7
No 368 95.3
Previous medical illness
Yes 37 9.6
No 349 90.4
Social support
Poor 65 16.8
Moderate 159 41.2
Strong 162 42.0
Using mass media
Yes 274 71.0
No 112 29.0
Using social media
Yes 220 57.0
No 166 43.0
Alcohol
Yes 135 34.9
No 251 65.1
probably use alcohol as self-medication for their fear and for
their concerns of negative evaluation by others [18].
Social support was another important factor associated
with social phobia. Students with poor and moderate social
support had about two times more odds to have social phobia
as compared with students who had strong social support and
the finding was in line with the study done in Iran [7]. Social
connectedness is important for the development of confi-
dence and positive social skills. In addition to poor social sup-
port, students who lived with single parent were more than 5
times more likely to have social phobia as compared with stu-
dents who lived or were raised by both parents. This finding
was supported by study done in Saudi Arabia [31]. However,
students’ media usage, wealth index, past psychiatric history,
and family history of mental illness did not show any
association with social phobia in this study.
5. Limitations of the Study
The first limitation of the study may be the fact that we used
nondiagnostic self-rating screening tool; the prevalence of
social phobia might be overestimated. The other limitation
is that we did not measure substance use by a standard tool
and consuming a substance for one day and daily use of a
substance were reported as substance use, and the association
may not be real if standard tool has been used. The last
limitation is our design which cannot show the direction of
association.
4 Psychiatry Journal
Table 3: Factors associated with social phobia.
Variables Social phobia COR (95% CI) AOR (95% CI)
Yes No
Sex
Male 41 192 1.00 1.00
Female 65 88 3.44 (2.17, 5.51) 3.10 (1.82,5.27)∗
Age (years)
16–19 102 244 3.76 (1.31, 10.84) 2.02 (.66, 6.26)
>19 4 36 1.00 1.00
Alcohol (current use)
Yes 47 88 1.74 (1.10, 2.75) 1.75 (1.03,2.98)∗∗
No 59 192 1.00 1.00
Psychiatric history
Yes 7 7 2.76 (.94, 8.06) 3.15 (.97, 10.29)
No 99 273 1.00 1.00
Social support
Poor 25 40 2.75 (1.45, 5.20) 2.40 (1.17,4.92)∗∗
Moderate 51 108 2.08 (1.24, 3.49) 2.14 (1.20,3.80)∗∗
Strong 30 132 1.00 1.00
Living status (students were raised by or lived with)
Both parents 53 214 1.00 1.00
Single parent 38 23 6.67 (3.67, 12.14) 5.72 (2.98,10.99)∗
Alone/others 15 43 1.41 (.73, 2.73) 1.86 (.91, 3.82)
Note:∗?< 0.001 and∗∗?< 0.05.
6. Conclusion
The proportion of social phobia was higher which was
predicted by female gender, current alcohol use, living with
single parent, and having poor social support. School and
community intervention on students’ alcohol use is impor-
tant. Moreover, school-based youth-friendly mental health
service might be very helpful to tackle this problem and to
help students with this problem. Further longitudinal and
interventional studies are needed to describe the longitudinal
nature of the illness and to identify risk factors.
Competing Interests
All authors declared that they have no competing interests
regarding the publication of this paper.
Authors’ Contributions
Kindie Mekuria conceived the original idea and partic-
ipated in proposal development, data collection, analysis
of the data, and preparation of the manuscript and in all
stages of the project. Haregwoin Mulat, Habtamu Derajew,
Tesfa Mekonen, Wubalem Fekadu, Amsalu Belete, Solomon
Yimer, Getasew Legas, Melak Menberu, Asmamaw Getnet,
and Simegnew Kibret participated in proposal development,
design, analysis, interpretation of data, and preparation of the
manuscript and in all stages of the research.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the study participants for
their unlimited cooperation and Amanuel Mental Specialized
Hospital for the financial support. They also would like to
thank Woldia preparatory school staff members for their
support during the data collection.
References
[1] American Psychiatric Association, “Anxiety disorders,” in Diag-
nostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, American
Psychiatric Association, Washington, DC, USA, 5th edition,
2013.
[2] S. M. Valente, “Social phobia,” Journal of the American Psychi-
atric Nurses Association, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 67–75, 2002.
[3] D. Villiers, Perfectionism and social anxiety among college
students [Counseling psychology Disssertations], Northeastern
University, Boston, Mass, USA, 2009.
[4] M. H. Pollack, “Social anxiety disorder (social phobia): effective
treatment,” Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, vol. 62, no. 12, pp. 24–
29, 2006.
[5] H. Wittchen, “Social phobia: new perspectives on neglected
mental disorder,” Psychiatric Networks, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 5–8,
2007.
[6] N. Dodangi, N. Habibi Ashtiani, and B. Valadbeigi, “Prevalence
of DSM-IV TR psychiatric disorders in children and adoles-
cents of Paveh, a Western City of Iran,” Iranian Red Crescent
Medical Journal, vol. 16, no. 7, Article ID e16743, 2014.
Psychiatry Journal 5
[7] S. Talepasand and M. Nokani, “Social phobia symptoms: preva-
lence and sociodemographic correlates,” Archives of Iranian
Medicine, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 522–527, 2010.
[8] M. Burstein, J.-P. He, G. Kattan, A. M. Albano, S. Avenevoli, and
K. R. Merikangas, “Social phobia and subtypes in the National
Comorbidity Survey-Adolescent Supplement: prevalence, cor-
relates, and comorbidity,” Journal of the American Academy of
Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, vol. 50, no. 9, pp. 870–880, 2011.
[9] L. Wetterberg, “Social anxiety in 17-year-olds in Stockholm,
Sweden—a questionnaire survey,” South African Psychiatry
Review, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 30–32, 2004.
[10] F. R. Schneier, T. E. Foose, D. S. Hasin et al., “Social anxiety
disorder and alcohol use disorder co-morbidity in the national
epidemiologic survey on alcohol and related conditions,” Psy-
chological Medicine, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 977–988, 2010.
[11] V. Chhabra, M. Bhatia, S. Gupta, P. Kumar, and S. Srivastava,
“Prevalence of Social Phobia in school-going adolescents in an
urban area,” Delhi Psychiatry Journal, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 18–25,
2009.
[12] Y. Jin, L. He, Y. Kang et al., “Prevalence and risk factors of
anxiety status among students aged 13–26 years,” International
Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, vol. 7, no. 11, pp.
4420–4426, 2014.
[13] M. Van Ameringen, C. Mancini, and P. Farvolden, “The impact
of anxiety disorders on educational achievement,” Journal of
Anxiety Disorders, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 561–571, 2003.
[14] Z. Acarturk, Epidemiology and Psychological Treatment of Social
Phobia, Department of Clinical of The Vrije Univer-
sity in Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2009.
[15] M. M. Ohayon and A. F. Schatzberg, “Social phobia and depres-
sion: prevalence and comorbidity,” Journal of Psychosomatic
Research, vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 235–243, 2010.
[16] B. K. Gültekin and I. F. Dereboy, “The prevalence of social
phobia, and its impact on quality of life, academic achievement,
and identity formation in university students,” Turkish Journal
Of Psychiatry, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 150–158, 2011.
[17] J. D. Buckner, N. B. Schmidt, A. R. Lang, J. W. Small, R. C.
Schlauch, and P. M. Lewinsohn, “Specificity of social anxiety
disorder as a risk factor for alcohol and cannabis dependence,”
Journal of Psychiatric Research, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 230–239, 2008.
[18] B. O. Olatunji, J. M. Cisler, and D. F. Tolin, “Quality of life in the
anxiety disorders: a meta-analytic review,” Clinical
Review, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 572–581, 2007.
[19] H.-U. Wittchen and L. Fehm, “Epidemiology, patterns of
comorbidity, and associated disabilities of social phobia,” Psy-
chiatric Clinics of North America, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 617–641, 2001.
[20] K.-I. Okano, “Shame and social phobia: a transcultural view-
point,” Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 323–
338, 1994.
[21] K. M. Connor, J. R. T. Davidson, L. Erik Churchill, A. Sherwood,
E. Foa, and R. H. Weisler, “Psychometric properties of the social
phobia inventory (SPIN). New self- rating scale,” British Journal
of Psychiatry, vol. 176, no. 4, pp. 379–386, 2000.
[22] M. M. Antony, M. J. Coons, R. E. McCabe, A. Ashbaugh, and
R. P. Swinson, “Psychometric properties of the social phobia
inventory: further evaluation,” Behaviour Research and Therapy,
vol. 44, no. 8, pp. 1177–1185, 2006.
[23] S. D. Messing and J. S. Prince, “Health practices in Ethiopian
pre-urban communities,” Journal of Health and Human Behav-
ior, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 272–276, 1966.
[24] K. Ranta, R. Kaltiala-Heino, P. Rantanen, M. T. Tuomisto, and
M. Marttunen, “Screening social phobia in adolescents from
general population: the validity of the Social Phobia Inventory
(SPIN) against a clinical interview,” European Psychiatry, vol. 22,
no. 4, pp. 244–251, 2007.
[25] H. Bøen, “Characteristics of senior centre users—and the
impact of a group programme on social support and late-life
depression,” Norsk Epidemiologi, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 261–269, 2012.
[26] J. Bracik, K. Krysta, and A. Zaczek, “Impact of family and school
environment on the development of social anxiety disorder: a
questionnaire study,” Psychiatria Danubina, vol. 24, no. 1, pp.
125–127, 2012.
[27] F. R. Schneier, T. E. Foose, D. S. Hasin et al., “Social anxiety
disorder and alcohol use disorder co-morbidity in the National
Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions,”
Psychological Medicine, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 977–988, 2010.
[28] H. M. Azab, U. A. Mussttafa, and M. A. El-Khouli, “Social
phobia among secondary school students: a comparative study
between Egypt, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates,”
The Egyptian Journal of Psychiatry, vol. 26, no. 1, 2007.
[29] B. F. Hummadi and A. K. AlObaidi, “Social phobia among
secondary school students in Baghdad/Iraq,” Journal of the
Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, vol. 23,
no. 1, pp. 70–71, 2014.
[30] R. M. Crum and L. A. Pratt, “Risk of heavy drinking and alcohol
use disorders in social phobia: a prospective analysis,” American
Journal of Psychiatry, vol. 158, no. 10, pp. 1693–1700, 2001.
[31] M. Ali and S. A. Al-Qahtani, “Prevalence and risk factors of
social phobia among secondary school male students in Khamis
Mushayt,” Medical Journal Cairo University, vol. 80, no. 1, pp.
871–876, 2012.
Submit your manuscripts at
https://www.hindawi.com
Stem Cells
International
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
MEDIATORS
INFLAMMATION
of
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Behavioural
Neurology
Endocrinology
International Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Disease Markers
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
BioMed
Research International
Oncology
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Oxidative Medicine and
Cellular Longevity
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
PPAR Research
The Scientific
World Journal
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Immunology Research
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Journal of
Obesity
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Computational and
Mathematical Methods
in Medicine
Ophthalmology
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Diabetes Research
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Research and Treatment
AIDS
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Gastroenterology
Research and Practice
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Parkinson’s
Disease
Evidence-Based
Complementary and
Alternative Medicine
Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more