7/13/2021 PUB-7002 V3: Administrative (6929289940) – PUB-7002 V3: Administrative (6929289940)
https://ncuone.ncu.edu/d2l/le/content/108827/printsyllabus/PrintSyllabus 1/4
Week 6
PUB-7002 V3: Administrative (6929289940)
Judicial and Legislative Reviews
The U.S. Judicial Branch is largely looked upon as the primary branch of the federal
government with the prevailing oversight function necessary to subordinate agency-level
administrative actions to the rule of law. As such, the federal courts provide a formal
check-and-balance against potential abuses of administrative discretion and worse—
potentially unconstitutional, illegal, unethical, or procedurally-irregular regulatory
decision-making (and subsequent enforcement)—within the specific scope and details of a
single case. Despite relatively broad powers to address grievances brought before it for
review, the judiciary is unable to initiate cases. It can only decide matters formally brought
for legal review through the appropriate legal channels with issues arising on
constitutional or statutory grounds. Once an individual legal decision is made, it is often
aggregated and implemented as accepted administrative practice. A majority of federal
judicial reviews take place at one of 89 district courts within the United States (up to 4
per state/territory based on population size) that hear both civil and criminal disputes.
Above these district courts are a series of circuit-level appeals courts and ultimately, the
U.S. Supreme Court. As the nation’s top court, the Supreme Court’s primary function is as
an appeals court being brought forward from a lower appeals court or a state-level
supreme court. The Supreme Court functions as a trial court in rare cases where there are
major legal controversies occurring between two or more states (Rosenbloom, 2015).
Unlike judicial reviews, constitutionally-mandated legislative review functions occur
anytime the legislative body is in session. Legislative oversight applies to any federal
program or function that requires congressionally-appropriated funds. Because Congress
retains exclusive ‘power of the purse,’ such a financial review is, by design, meant to
ensure the federal agency’s regulatory actions remain within the proper scope of
legislative intent. Formal legislative oversight runs the gambit of administrative concerns,
ranging from human resources, financial budgets, technology issues, and strategic
planning to name a few (Rosenbloom, 2015). Following the Legislative Reorganization Act
of 1946, formal standing congressional committees were established in both the (now)
435-member U.S. House of Representatives and the 100-member U.S. Senate, thereby
drawing upon the professional qualifications and experiences of its diverse representative
body. Through ongoing committee-level oversight into specific agency-level annual
https://ncuone.ncu.edu/d2l/home/108827
7/13/2021 PUB-7002 V3: Administrative (6929289940) – PUB-7002 V3: Administrative (6929289940)
https://ncuone.ncu.edu/d2l/le/content/108827/printsyllabus/PrintSyllabus 2/4
Books and Resources for this Week
Rosenbloom, D. H. (2015).
Administrative law for public managers.
Boulder, Colorado : Westview Press,
2015.
Link
Cass, R. A. (2017). Staying agency rules:
Constitutional structure and rule of law
in the administrative state.
Administrative Review, 69(2), 225-
Link
Clark, B., & Leiter, A. (2011). Regulatory
hide and seek: What agencies can (and
can’t) do to limit judicial review. Boston
College Review…
Link
budgetary requirements and personnel policies, well-developed conduits of information
sharing and professional communication/rapport have developed between individual
agencies and their respective congressional committee members.
Reference:
Rosenbloom, D. H. (2015). Administrative law for public managers (2nd ed.). Boulder, CO:
Westview Press.
Be sure to review this week’s resources carefully. You are expected to apply the
information from these resources when you prepare your assignments.
80 % 4 of 5 topics complete
javascript:void(0);
https://ncuone.ncu.edu/d2l/le/content/108827/viewContent/1145551/View
https://ncuone.ncu.edu/d2l/le/content/108827/viewContent/1145543/View
https://ncuone.ncu.edu/d2l/le/content/108827/viewContent/1145544/View
7/13/2021 PUB-7002 V3: Administrative (6929289940) – PUB-7002 V3: Administrative (6929289940)
https://ncuone.ncu.edu/d2l/le/content/108827/printsyllabus/PrintSyllabus 3/4
Nelson, W. A. (2017). Unfaithful
execution of the law: Congressional
interference with agency decision-
making. Seton Hall Legislative Journal,
42(1),
Link
Week 6 – Assignment: Assess the Oversight Functions
of Administrative Rulemaking
Assignment
Due July 25 at 11:59 PM
To ensure the fair, efficient, and transparent administration of public services, a variety of
information-specific mechanisms were put in place to drive and monitor how subordinate
agencies operate and share public information. Assess the existence and effects of judicial
oversight of federal administrative agencies by addressing the following in a written
report:
Appraise how courts act as a checks and balances of administrative agencies.
Evaluate the fundamental role of legislative oversight relative to administrative
agencies.
Evaluate the fundamental role of judicial review as it relates to administrative
agencies.
Distinguish between procedural and substantive due process.
Evaluate potential barriers to contemporary judicial review.
Support your assignment with at least five scholarly resources. In addition to these
specified resources, other appropriate scholarly resources, including seminal articles, may
be included.
Length: 5-7 pages, not including title and reference pages
Your assignment should demonstrate thoughtful consideration of the ideas and concepts
presented in the course by providing new thoughts and insights relating directly to this
topic. Your response should reflect scholarly writing and current APA standards. Be sure
to adhere to Northcentral University’s Academic Integrity Policy.
Upload your document and click the Submit to Dropbox button.
https://ncuone.ncu.edu/d2l/le/content/108827/viewContent/1145545/View
https://ncuone.ncu.edu/d2l/le/content/108827/viewContent/1145522/View
7/13/2021 PUB-7002 V3: Administrative (6929289940) – PUB-7002 V3: Administrative (6929289940)
https://ncuone.ncu.edu/d2l/le/content/108827/printsyllabus/PrintSyllabus 4/4
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more