Unacceptable Needs Improvement Competent Exemplary
Suggest the prototyping technique you would use for
this system and support your rationale.
0 (0.00%)
Did not submit or incompletely suggested the prototyping
technique you would use for this system; did not submit or
incompletely supported your rationale.
10.125 (11.25%)
Partially suggested the prototyping technique you would use
for this system; partially supported your rationale.
11.475 (12.75%)
Satisfactorily suggested the prototyping technique you would
use for this system; satisfactorily supported your rationale.
13.5 (15.00%)
Thoroughly suggested the prototyping technique you would
use for this system; thoroughly supported your rationale.
Create a management plan containing eight to ten stages
for proper design of such a system.
0 (0.00%)
Did not submit or incompletely created a management plan
containing eight to ten stages for proper design of such a
system.
10.125 (11.25%)
Partially created a management plan containing eight to ten
stages for proper design of such a system.
11.475 (12.75%)
Satisfactorily created a management plan containing eight to
ten stages for proper design of such a system.
13.5 (15.00%)
Thoroughly created a management plan containing eight to
ten stages for proper design of such a system.
Explain each stage of the management plan and justify
your rationale.
0 (0.00%)
Did not submit or incompletely explained each stage of the
management plan and did not submit or incompletely justified
your rationale.
10.125 (11.25%)
Partially explained each stage of the management plan and
partially justified your rationale.
11.475 (12.75%)
Satisfactorily explained each stage of the management plan
and satisfactorily justified your rationale.
13.5 (15.00%)
Thoroughly explained each stage of the management plan
and thoroughly justified your rationale.
Estimate the length of time it will take to complete each
stage of the management plan.
0 (0.00%)
Did not submit or incompletely estimated the length of time it
will take to complete each stage of the management plan.
10.125 (11.25%)
Partially estimated the length of time it will take to complete
each stage of the management plan.
11.475 (12.75%)
Satisfactorily estimated the length of time it will take to
complete each stage of the management plan.
13.5 (15.00%)
Thoroughly estimated the length of time it will take to
complete each stage of the management plan.
Compare and contrast the self-check-in interface with the
interface a receptionist would use.
0 (0.00%)
Did not submit or incompletely compared and contrasted the
self-check-in interface with the interface a receptionist would
use.
10.125 (11.25%)
Partially compared and contrasted the self-check-in interface
with the interface a receptionist would use.
11.475 (12.75%)
Satisfactorily compared and contrasted the self-check-in
interface with the interface a receptionist would use.
13.5 (15.00%)
Thoroughly compared and contrasted the self-check-in
interface with the interface a receptionist would use.
Use Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative, Dia, to
create a total of two graphical representations of your
proposed interfaces, one for the self-check-in and one
for the receptionist.
0 (0.00%)
Did not submit or incompletely used Microsoft Visio or an
open source alternative, Dia, to create a total of two graphical
representations of your proposed interfaces, one for the self-
check-in and one for the receptionist.
6.75 (7.50%)
Partially used Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative,
Dia, to create a total of two graphical representations of your
proposed interfaces, one for the self-check-in and one for the
receptionist.
7.65 (8.50%)
Satisfactorily used Microsoft Visio or an open source
alternative, Dia, to create a total of two graphical
representations of your proposed interfaces, one for the self-
check-in and one for the receptionist.
9 (10.00%)
Thoroughly used Microsoft Visio or an open source
alternative, Dia, to create a total of two graphical
representations of your proposed interfaces, one for the self-
check-in and one for the receptionist.
Three references. 0 (0.00%)
No references provided.
3.375 (3.75%)
Does not meet the required number of references; some or
all references poor quality choices.
3.825 (4.25%)
Meets number of required references; all references high
quality choices.
4.5 (5.00%)
Exceeds number of required references; all references high
quality choices.
Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements. 0 (0.00%)
More than 6 errors present.
6.75 (7.50%)
5-6 errors present.
7.65 (8.50%)
3-4 errors present.
9 (10.00%)
0-2 errors present.
Name: w04a1
Description: w04a1 – Case Study – Design Process
ExitExit
Grid View List View
Name:w04a1
Description:w04a1 – Case Study – Design Process
ExitExit
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more