EDCO 745
Poster: Final Grading Rubric
Criteria
Levels of Achievement
Content
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
Below Expectations
Not present
Summary of the Research
23 to 25 points
The student’s summary included ample arguments for why further research was warranted for the selected counseling topic and clearly identified research question(s) that should be addressed.
21 to 22 points
Most of the student’s summary included arguments for why further research was warranted for the selected counseling topic and identified research question(s).
19 to 20 points
Some of the student’s summary needed to be developed more fully. Arguments lacked sufficient information why further research was warranted for the selected counseling topic and identified research question(s).
1 to 18 points
The student’s summary did not include arguments for why further research was warranted for the selected counseling topic and identified research question(s).
0 points
Not Present
Working Research Question(s)
23 to 25 points
The working research questions are clearly stated and understandable.
21 to 22 points
Most of the working research questions are stated and understandable.
19 to 20 points
Some of the working research questions are stated but are vague.
1 to 18 points
Working research questions are poorly stated and cannot be understood.
0 points
Not Present
Participants
10 points
The participants sought for the study are well-described and the strategy for recruiting them is clearly described.
9 points
Most of the participants sought for the study are described and the strategy for recruiting them is present.
8 points
Some of the participants sought for the study are partially described and the strategy for recruiting them is partially described.
1 to 7 points
The participants sought for the study are minimally described and the strategy for recruiting them is minimally described.
0 points
Not Present
Procedure
10 points
The Procedures for the project are well-described.
9 points
Most of the procedures for the project are described.
8 points
Some of the procedures for the project are partially described.
1 to 7 points
Procedures for the project are poorly described.
0 points
Not Present
Measures
10 points
The measures/interviews are well-described.
9 points
Most of the measures/interviews are described.
8 points
Some of the measures/interviews are partially described.
1 to 7 points
The measures/interviews are poorly described.
0 points
Not Present
IV, DVs, Covariates
interview questions
10 points
The IV, DVs, and covariates (if applicable) are clearly stated and understandable.
9 points
Most of the IV, DVs, and covariates (if applicable) are clearly stated and understandable.
8 points
Some of the IV, DVs, and covariates (if applicable) interview questions are partially described.
1 to 7 points
IV, DVs, and covariates interview questions are poorly described.
0 points
Not Present
Results
55 to 60 points
The appropriate tables and visuals given the analysis.
51 to 54 points
Most of the appropriate tables and visuals given the analysis.
46 to 50 points
Some of the appropriate tables and visuals given the analysis.
1 to 45 points
Appropriate tables and visuals are poorly presented in the analysis.
0 points
Not Present
Discussion
23 to 25 points
Interpretation of results, limitations, and future research discussed.
21 to 22 points
Most of the interpretation of results, limitations, and future research discussed.
19 to 20 points
Some of the interpretation of results, limitations, and future research discussed.
1 to 18 points
Interpretation of results, limitations, and future research include limited discussion.
0 points
Not Present
Structure
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
Below Expectations
Not present
Organization
23 to 25 points
All required elements are included and presented with strong headings and organizational clarity.
The method presentation is logically oriented.
The assignment meets the page length requirement.
21 to 22 points
All required elements are included and organized.
The method presentation is logically oriented.
The assignment meets the page length requirement or comes very close.
19 to 20 points
Most required elements are included and are mostly organized.
The method presentation needs improvement.
The assignment may not meet the page length requirement.
1 to 18 points
Few or no required elements are included.
There may not be a logical method presentation.
The assignment does not meet the page length requirement.
0 points
Not Present
Style
23 to 25 points
The assignment properly uses current APA style and reflects doctoral writing quality. In-text citations and references list are formatted correctly. The assignment reflects a graduate level voice and vocabulary. There are very few spelling and/or grammar errors.
21 to 22 points
The assignment mostly uses current APA style and and reflects doctoral writing quality.
In-text citations and references list are mostly formatted correctly.
The assignment reflects generally a graduate level voice and vocabulary.
There are few spelling and/or grammar errors.
19 to 20 points
The assignment uses some current APA style and and reflects doctoral writing quality.
In-text citations and references list are sometimes formatted correctly.
The assignment sometimes reflects a graduate level voice and vocabulary.
There are some spelling and/or grammar errors.
1 to 18 points
The assignment uses few current APA style and and reflects doctoral writing quality.
In-text citations and references list are rarely formatted correctly.
The assignment seldom reflects a graduate level voice and vocabulary.
There are many spelling and/or grammar errors.
0 points
Not Present
Sources
23 to 25 points
The Reference page includes all sources.
All sources are referenced somewhere in the assignment.
21 to 22 points
The Reference page includes all or most sources.
All or most sources are referenced somewhere in the assignment.
19 to 20 points
The Reference page includes most or some sources.
Most or some sources are referenced somewhere in the assignment.
1 to 18 points
The Reference page includes few sources.
Few sources are referenced somewhere in the assignment.
0 points
Not Present
Page 2 of 2
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more